Ideal of DDG 167 improvement

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I think with Sovromenyys the drift in chinese naval modernisation comes clealrly present, in other side is the importance to begun building bulk and nucleous of that what in future will be chinese blue water force, and yet to have as many failry modern surface combadants to keep the current fleets fighting ability at least in some level. Despites its dating technology, the Sovs still present far superior platforms comapared to chinese domestic vessels save 052C and 054A. They are sobust and well proven vessels dedicated to to anti-ship strikes but backed with considerable ASW and AAW element for selfdefence (thus still presenting best in those fields what PLAN had at the moment they were aquired, and that fact remains with the ASW...)

So I dont see them missinvestment if you know to look them in the contest where they are in PLAN. With All things with the PLAN, you need to look the ships compared to PLANs situation and state.

What comes to the Luhai class, its bit mystical ship. In order to understand it, one must understand the state of PLAN and chinese shipdevelopment in the 1990's. Chinese shipdesign history had it's major milestone in the very late 80's when it won the contract to build frigates to Thailands navy. The frigates consistet the Jinaghu-III class already in PLAN service and two completely new and bigger "western" level frigates. Those were the Narusean (025T) class. The task was huge thing for chinese shipbuilders. Imagine that you have earlier build only tree-houses and now suddenly you had to build a officebuilding...
Chinese however recieved considerable help from Blohm & Voss in Germany and the ships featured some innovaties from the MEKO desing. But regrdless of this the ships were poorly build. For example some departments of the ships were completely isolated and you had to come to out to the maindeck in order to move along the ship. Also the damage control and other features didn't mach for western standarts.

At the same time China was building its first new generation destroyers which were by the way halted in order to get the ofboard deals completed. The Chinese were able to incorporate some of the modular design filosophies with the new "Luhu" class as well but like their export counterparts, they too suffered from the lack of shipdesign skills of chinese. For example the fisrt vessels gasturbine rooms were too small and the turbines didn't fit untill reconstruction. Also the Gasturbine availbility came very difficult after the 1989 incidence and thats propaply one of the main reasons why the class weren't duplicated.

But the need for new destroyers remained and thus chinese were forced to simply enlargening the sole destroyer that they knew how to build, the 051 class (Luda). The hull was new, pretty much same as in Luhu class, but the propulsion arragment was taken from the old Luda design. In reality, the sole ship of the class, 167 is as effective as two Ludas. (105 with the helicopter and 166 with the HQ-7, Yj83, new guns anf new radards)
The availability of gasturbines was most likely improved as the chinese did as they should have, returned to the 052 design as it was far modern and viable than the ill-famous 167. New weapons from russia and development breaktrough with domestic SAMs gave the new ships (052B/C) new modern touch.

PS. The 3d radar onboard 167 and few modernised Ludas is the Type 381A Rice Shield, a radar that was developted alongside with the chinese first SAM effort, HQ61. Its prototype was fitted, as was the missilesystems to the Jiangdong class (which was funnily enough the prototype for Jianghu class, tough only completed 20 years after its lauch). The reason why this radar wasen't fitted to the 052B was the fact that the Russian Fregat radar was superior. However chinese adopted the two array-arragment from the russian radar to their new 3d phassed array radar (I don't know its designation) which is fitted to the 054A class.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
actually, I'm not sure the 167 in shipyard is to upgrade.as well as 525.

Hi, tphuang,are you sure about this.maybe they just have had another rif system.

I never said 167 is getting the upgrade. Although interestingly, a couple of photos posted on CDF today showed that the Type 381 radar was taken down. Each rif system costs 150 million according to the Russians, I don't think such a major transaction could've taken place without people noticing. Interestingly enough, China is probably quite pissed off that the version of rif they got does not have anti-missile capability.

Dear Sirs:

The obsolesence of many of the older PLAN platforms (warships) is the consequence of its' headlong modernization - as well as that of China's shipyards/shipbuilding in general.

I personally feel that many of the older warships, the Jiangwei 1 FFG's, DDG 113 and 114, DDG 167 as well as the Sov's fall into this category - not just the Luda and Jiangnan classes.

DDG 113/114 are probably still the most useful of the older vessels, having pioneered many PLAN systems, such as gas turbine engines, the twin-37 mm CIWS, a local version of TAVITAC(?), a helicopter hanger and SAMs.

Still despite this, they have older electronic systems, particularly in their radars (especially that enormous 2D affair amidships) and combat information systems - and are built on a small and rather unstealthy hull form.

DDG 167 is for me rather a disappointment, having the same armament layout as the older destroyers on a larger hull but with steam propulsion (Q - why does no other PLAN vessel adopt her 3D radar?). She like the Sov's are probably very expensive and fuel-hungry ships to operate, as well as difficult to maintain.

I believe the PLAN should not have imported the second set of Sov's, they were overpriced and very limited vessels. The fact that DDG 115 and 116 follow this obsolescent layout seems to indicate that a faction within the PLAN prefers this.

For the moment the PLAN should stick with either gas turbine propulsion or with diesel or better yet with CODAG or CODAD systems. Steam propulsion should be left to the nuclear submarines.

The most cost effective surface combatants the PLAN is acquiring are the 054A frigates, they should build a lot of them to replace all the older difficult to maintain and obsolescent vessels.

The best thing they could do with DDG 167 is to provide minor improvements to her missile systems, electronics and sensors, and hand her over to the training command.

Best Regards,

Dusky Lim
well put, it's shocking how much I agree with that.
one thing though, I don't have problem with getting Sovs, it's more an issue of how much they paid for them, especially the second sets. There is no way that a Sov should cost twice as much as Talwar.
167 though, it has the dubious title of the largest combat ship in the world with only point defense.
 

RavenWing278

Junior Member
has anyone thought that DDG 115 and 116 will be for export? seeing as it's technology compared with the newer chinese DDGs is obsolete?
 

kickars

Junior Member
has anyone thought that DDG 115 and 116 will be for export? seeing as it's technology compared with the newer chinese DDGs is obsolete?

That's what I thought initially. But I don't think PLAN would spend huge a amount of cash just to build two DDG for future export without any buyer first. Anyway, the whole 051s are just disappointment.
 

planeman

Senior Member
VIP Professional
luhaimodae0.jpg
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
It does look like that the main gun has also been removed so I'm betting it will get one of those stealthy turrets.

So far though the HQ-7 and its FCR is still there, but who knows a week from now.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
It does look like that the main gun has also been removed so I'm betting it will get one of those stealthy turrets.

So far though the HQ-7 and its FCR is still there, but who knows a week from now.

Nice catch, wonder why I didn't see it, lol.

Without major structural change, I think the changes they can do include replacing the 4 37mm AA guns with 4 AK-630ms + the FCR, replace the main gun with 100 mm on 052B/C, replacing the current sea eagle radar with the double faced sea eagle we see on 054A and Type 517 with the VHF band radar on 052C. Depending on what role they want this ship to play, even if it still just carries HH-7, it can still do some kind of early warning and data sharing with other ships with longer ranged SAMs.
has anyone thought that DDG 115 and 116 will be for export? seeing as it's technology compared with the newer chinese DDGs is obsolete?
doubtful, NSF is really lacking AAW. If 115 and 116's rif get the anti-missile upgrade, then I think the two of them combined offers as much AAW as a kirov.
 

planeman

Senior Member
VIP Professional
I'm actually hoping to see a more ASW optimised refit, such as addition of SS-N-27 Ascroc missiles:
luhaimod2hi7.jpg
 

duskylim

Junior Member
VIP Professional
Dear Sirs:

If the upgrade results in a vessel that resembles the picture planeman so kindly posted, then well and good, it would probably be a worthwhile upgrade.

However (nitpicking here..), a better location for the Type 730 CIWS would be midships, i.e. abeam of the main mast, or slightly behind the forward superstructure, so as not to interfere with the torpedo tubes, rather than atop the helicopter hanger.

That being said, it still seems to me to be a waste of both the PLANs and the shipyards limited resources to undertake such a radical upgrade of what is a very disappointing (and limited!) design in the very first place.

I suppose one could argue that with the PLAN being in a hurry to get more AAW destroyers and all the while being conservative, relying on Dalian for the upgrade as well as Hudong and Huangpo, is not that big a waste of resources, that is using the naval yard versus the competing commercial yards.

If that is the case, then Dalian is very much behind the other yards in ship design and general level of technology. The very least they could do is start using diesels in their surface combatants! That would result in vessels with engines that were far more compact, reliable and economical.

The 051C's are in the final analysis modernized 167's very much jury-rigged to carry the RIF missile system. The whole affair brings the words "force-fit" to mind.

They are most definitely (in almost every way) inferior to the 052C's and more likely than not also inferior to the 054A frigates.

My advice to them would be to stop fiddling and tooling around an inferior design, swallow your pride and ask for help from the two commercial yards; then start making 054A's - or better yet, maybe an upgraded model.

Best Regards,

Dusky Lim
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
For me, since the ship isn't on dry dock, that rules out major structural changes. I am guessing its only going to get upgraded radars, perhaps the Fregat like Sea Eagle replacing the Type 381, the stealthy turret with the 76mm, upgrades on the HQ-7 and FCR, and maybe stealthy turrets for the AK-130s.

VLS upgrade would have required the ship going into dry dock. The change from HQ-61 to HQ-7 did not, as the launchers were completely on surface.

I do think it's possible that the AK-130s be removed and replaced by putting two Type 730s like Planeman suggested.

Another upgrade that I think is feasible like in Planeman's illustration is upgrade the antiship fire control radar to somewhat like the Mineral ME copy used on the 052B/C and 054A, giving the ship better over the horizon engagement.

I don't believe the 051 is a bad design, other than using boilers. Overall this is the first warship the PLAN made that has a modern appearance with consideration to lower radar signature. I think the shipyards were pushing their design and construction limits with this ship, which I think was the main goal, the armament fitting being only secondary.
 
Last edited:
Top