well from all the former and current carriers no navy has felt necessary to have more then 3 in their inventory nor build it to exceed 80,000tonnes. China's naval build up and military in general doesnt require it to follow the technology footsteps and doctrines of the United States to convert itself into a modern military nation.For the future Chinese aircraft carriers
I do not believe that chinese were able to create a advanced designs (catamaran, trimaran hull) at the beginning!
Why?
1) because China currently do not have a operationnel aircraft carrier (experience is decisive)
2) a advanced ships is very very expensive to develop !
3) Chinese engineers lack experience in aircraft carriers design (even't if melbourne, kiev and varyag design were extensively studied)
I think that the first Chinese aircraft carrier look like the former varyag, but with Chinese equipment (weapons, sensor), an island with more stealthy design, and a conventional propulsion
= probably in 50000/65000 tons range
it should appear towards 2013/2017 ?
by against, I think that the next aircraft carrier had followed were probably different. But I do not believe that chinese develop super aircraft carrier similar that US 80000/100000 tons ships.
But a smaller and more flexible designs (20000/45000 tons range), with a possible different hull (trimaran, catamaran ?)...............2018/2025 ?
The biggest carrier for China's needs is at most simular to that of Varyg and maybe smaller. Superior technology nation doesnt need to go unit for unit. At most China needs at around 6 carriers. As it has more unstable bordered nations that still needs to be resolved. Unlike Europe where 2 carriers are deemed fit. Remember China as a bigger terroritory to protect, and more countries bordering them that are enemy allies.