More of the truth comes through in CNN's still pro-rioter/anti-authorities biased coverage, most other US media are much worse and should not be trusted at all.
Yes, I couldn't believe what I just saw on the evening after a hard day at work. Just turned my TV on, and it was thuned to CNN, the report from Will Ridley. And I thought did I saw something different this before I set out to work? If I haven't already seen what happened, I would have completely opporsite!
He tried to make it look like the shooting was unnecessary by interviewing a girl eyewitness on the scene. But of course, we know she is actually one of the "cockroaches" she started to cry and saying the "protestors" were "unarmed" with no body armour! (basically defenceles). And therefore the shooting is unjust and unnecessary!
There was no counterview on this! Figures! Now, we all seen the footage, we saw the thug was walking towards the police with no sign of stopping! (if a policeman or anyone else was aimimg a gun at me, the last I would do is running towards him). Also, he was warned to stat back, and he still advancing. The policeman was already busy with one thug, what else is he espected to do?
Will Ridley went on to say the shooting anger the "public" which leads to roadblock being set up! Lol. Typical attemp at distorting the facts! (suggesting roadblock was the result of the shooting)! The fact barricade has already been set up in places is irrelevant!
He then went on to say the anger of the shooting lead to a man being set on fire! (again, the narratives are that all these unacceptable behaviours is down to the shooting)!
And the final manipulation is that CNN only shoewed the petrol being poured on to the man. The horrific fire and aftermath was completely cut out!
So the message was, it was the police that did the violent by shooting innocent protestors, and because of this, the subsequence response by the "peaceful demonstrator" is tamed and understandable!
