H-6 Bomber Aircraft Discussions

On the morning of Sept. 8, two H-6 bombers of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy made training flights across the sea area between the main Japanese islands of Okinawa and Miyako-Jima, and on to the West Pacific. Fighters of Japan Air Self Defense Force were scrambled urgently in response.

In an interview with People's Daily Online, General Yin Zhuo acknowledged that there had been flights of PLA bombers across the island chain. The combat range of these long-range bombers is over 2,000 km, and the purpose of training beyond the island chain is to assess tactical performance. Only by flying across the first island chain and on to the outer ocean can the limits of the maximum radius of operations be tested.

The Ministry of National Defense of China commented that this was part of routine training, and it would continue in the future

The Ministry of National Defense responded to reports of the Chinese bomber flights in the Japanese media by stating that military flight training in the West Pacific is a routine task in line with the annual schedule, is not aimed at any other country or any specific target, and is in accordance with the relevant international laws and practices. It also stated that the PLA would continue such routine operations in accordance with its future training schedules.

PLA bomber flights across the first island chain will help the development of tactics

Yin Zhuo explained in the interview that the bombers were always within the training range of the Chinese PLA Navy. He also pointed out that the combat range of long-range bombers is over 2,000 km, and that limiting training to the area within the island chain would hamper assessment of their tactical performance. Only by flying across the first island chain to the outer ocean can the limits of maximum flight radius and long-range operations be tested. It can therefore be anticipated that long-range training flights and voyages of both PLA aircraft and vessels will be standard practice. Japanese fighter responses will not affect the training activities of PLA aircraft.

According to Yin Zhuo, their enhanced response is a unilateral matter for Japan. An "air defense identification zone" is simply a range of alert that is determined unilaterally by one country in terms of international law. It does not have to be recognized or accorded any significance by other countries, nor does it have any legal status.

The range of the air defense identification zone defined by Japan is very broad, extending as far as the coast of Jiangsu Province in China. Whenever PLA aircraft take off within this area, they are considered to have entered Japan's air defense identification zone, which is extremely unreasonable.

Yin Zhuo pointed out that PLA aircraft should be able to transit international air space freely. He concluded that the PLA training schedule would continue as planned, and would not be influenced either by public opinion in Japan, or by responses from Japanese fighters.

Click to expand...

Jeff Head said:

My last numbers, and they could have changed are:

PLAAF- 82 H-6E/F/G/H/M, 15 H-6K aircraft, and 10 H-6U tankers
PLAN- 30 H-6D strike aircraft

That's a total of 137 currently active H-6 aircraft. The number of H-6K aircraft will continue to grow too, if it hasn't already.

Click to expand...

franco-russe said:

I hold Cinese bomber regiments, give or take one or two, so that adds up to 90 in PLAAF (including two regiments of H-6K) and 30 in PLANAF.

In addition, I am pretty sure PLAAF now has a full tanker regiment of 18 H-6U. The SSF bomber regiment has 6 H-6DU in addition to its regular bombers.

Click to expand...

Skywatcher said:

So for the record, the H-6K's payload is around 12-15 tons (there was some news article about that, I'll go see if I can go dig it up).

Click to expand...