H-20 bomber (with H-X, JH-XX)

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Right, if you read the Chinese article of this, it's hard to think it would point to anything over than H-20. I wouldn't consider J-35 as having great, historical significance. If you are really optimistic, you could guess this to be like a demonstrator(2001) version of 6th gen. But after J-20, does 6th gen really have great, historical significance? I don't think so.

Put it this way, if US doesn't finish developing B-21 on time, it would still have B-2, B-1B and B-52. If China doesn't finish developing H-20 on time, it has H-6K.

And if we add this to the story from earlier this year (I think around March) that H-20 was seen outside, it would make sense they would be able to make a first flight during the second half of the year. I would be curious how long this would take to join service if it in fact does make its maiden flight in a month or two. It took J-20 over 5 years go from 2001 to the first units at FTTC and another 15 months to join service (about 7 years in total). It took about 4 years for H-6K to join service. It took about 7.5 years for B-2 to join service. With those in mind, we can maybe look forward to a small number of H-20 being delivered by 2027 and joining service in 2028/2029 in the best case scenario. That would definitely be several years ahead of what US intelligence has projected.
 

iantsai

Junior Member
Registered Member
Latest Weibo news said that this should be J35 to be tested flight soon, not H20
I don't think so.

J-35 already finished her maiden flight as photos leaked. It would be even longer if we trace back to the first flight of FC-31.

And also, a carrier-borne combat aircraft could not be something of "strategic and historical significance" as Ge described.

Even J-20 was never described "strategic".
 
Last edited:

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
What, you expect me to support the US? Despite it's history, CIA, capitalism etc. etc.?

Yea no.

People would never pray for an advantage based on opponents making mistakes.:cool:
I know, but still hoping for the enemy to make mistakes isn't really that problematic, as long as oneself is still preparing for the worst case scenario.
 
Top