It's a bit hard to follow the discussion going on in the J-20 thread, as some stuff is being written there, some is here. Still, I guess here it'd be less off topic.
So, when talking about J-20 as a strike platform or when talking about a new plane for strike missions or using any other existing or planned (known) plane for strikes - the first thing to do, that might be useful, is to look at what missions are there, and what platforms are best suited for those missions.
1. Delivery of *heavy* cruise missiles against known targets. Meaning various fixed sites, but perhaps extending to currently non-mobile targets such as moored ships, parked vehicles/aircraft, deployed SAM sites etc.
I accentuate the word "heavy" as pretty much the same set of targets can and will be engaged by smaller munitions as well. The point of heavy cruise missiles is primarily added range. So those targets can be engaged from a very safe distance. The farther away a target is, the harder it is to actually engage anything else than fixed targets. That's because getting reliable and near real time information on relocatable targets so far away is usually quite problematic.
Air launched cruise missile in the class of Russian kh101 has ample range. Easily over 3000 km. US ALCM had similar range. AKD-10 is likely to feature very long range, closer to russian missile figures rather than sometimes mentioned 1500+ km.
With that sort of range - many targets will not require a stealthy launch platform at all. H-6K will suffice, very much.
There ARE some targets that might still require a stealthy launch platform, though. If one goes after Guam or Wake island, the carrier plane would first need to go out toward the first island chain, possibly even crossing that line sometimes. To do that and survive, a stealthy plane is certainly a better platform.
Yet, the whole mission is usually not something extremely time critical. After all, the targets are usually fixed sites. A subsonic H-20 would be a good fit for that job.
2. Delivery of even bigger missiles than 6-7 m long, 1m in width weapon. That category exists but it is a very, VERY niche category. Examples would be specialized anti-ship missiles, the kind USSR used. And to a lesser extent the Chinese YJ-12, which is still roughly in the heavy cruise missile weight/dimension category, though it does have a bigger wingspan. Another example of larger missiles would be various air launched ballistic missiles. The kind we're seeing being set up for H6K to be the launch platform. And H6K family of planes is perfect for it. Those planes' role is to extend the reach of the missile itself. It could just as easily be launched from the ground. But this way it probably enjoys several hundred km bigger range. In theory, if the plane could go a 1000 km away from the shore - the range could be even bigger. But in practice, getting reliable targeting data for targets so far away is again hard. Fixed targets would be more likely. And H6K would be a more cost effective solution, as long as it can enjoy fighter cover. Which means several hundred km out towards the first island chain. if a farther away launch point is needed, H20 would be a better choice. Though most likely that'd require a special launch harness, carriage underneath the plane, instead of inside it, and so on. Compromising stealth (though it'd still be much more stealthy than H6K) and potentially endangering a very expensive platform.
In my opinion it may not be worth it to even integrate such oversized weapons on H-20. If H6K can't handle the mission, then that mission might be better left to other, not aerial launch platforms altogether.
That also means that H20, and in turn all the other strike planes, smaller than H20, have no business being designed to carry anything bigger than a heavy cruise missile sized weapon.
3. Which brings us to the heavy antiship missile. Basically YJ-12 in its role, but not in its size. Instead, a different layout would likely be required. Perhaps something closer to brahmos? In any event, something that can be made more compact in terms of wingspan and overall width. While basic brahmos has folding wings in its ground launched variant, but NOT in its air launched variant, brahmos-m is a redesigned missile. When it is launched from a plane, it unfolds its wings. Overall it's a more compact missile, smaller even than YJ-12, so its range is limited to 300 km. But the full brahmos size is getting newer variants which are planned to achieve 500-600 km in range. An air launch would limit the need for a full size booster, thus the length of 8 meters might not be needed. In any case, a weapon that's designed from scratch to fit into H20 or some other plane, should be able to achieve 400-500 km range, with decent warhead, and still fit inside the AKD-10 size bracket. And do it all supersonically, like the YJ-12.
3b. Other large antiship missiles. These are notional categories. But something like air launched YJ-18, with only the terminal stage being supersonic, or something like LRASM, being subsonic all the way - are much easier to pack into planes. YJ-18 is basically the size of AKD-10, and LRASM could in theory fit into today's J-20. Or, if not, it wouldn't require a noticably bigger plane to fit a pair.
4. Smaller cruise missiles. JASSM and the like. J-20 might or might not be able to cram some in. (I can't be bothered to look for my own analysis of imagery where I concluded J-20's weapon bay is very, very close in being able to fit such a weapon) In any case, either a slightly bigger bay (requirng a new plane or modified J-20) would be needed, or the weapon itself would be slightly smaller. Possibly then achieving only 80% of JASSM's range/warhead etc. Which would still be respectable. Especially with JASSM-ER's numbers. (Not sure if JASSM-XR will indeed retain the same outer lines)
5. Large bombs. Similar to US MOP and so on. These are very heavy but not that voluminous actually. A H6K should be able to carry a 10 000 kg bomb, if one is designed. H-20 should be able to carry those. Not sure it'd be worth sizing a notional JH-XX to carry one. Though it probably could fit one underneath, semi recessed.
6. various smaller bombs and missiles. That's a category that even today's J-20 can carry. H-20 would be able to carry those in droves. And any notational strike-modified J-20 or JH-XX would be able to carry in decent numbers.
To be concluded...