Guam doesn't have robust defences against manoeuvring hypersonic glide missiles.
THAAD doesn't cut it, as it was designed for non-manoeuvring ballistic missiles.
Also Guam is only 3000km from Mainland China.
That is within range of current Valkyrie type drones with a range of 6000km which cost $2M.
So if you develop a version with a larger fuel tank, you can expect large number of Chinese UCAVs to sweep Guam and the surrounding areas at regular intervals. Short range stealth fighters like the F-22, F-35, J-20 will struggle to operate at these distances.
Guam most definitely will have defenses against maneuvring hypersonic glide vehicles in time.
The idea that a few "silver bullets" are sufficient to achieve a robust OCA success is very dangerous.
Multi-domain strikes that are simultaneous, and each domain being large in volume, supported by robust ISR and EW, should be the goal.
I address UCAVs more below.
From engineering point of view, UCAVs are mechanically pretty simple.
The Vakyries are just converted cruise missiles with a landing parachute and a payload bay.
That is why they are so cheap at $2M.
It's the datalinks and training the algorithms to operate the UCAVs which is the difficult part.
But that is a straightforward deep learning software problem.
We have yet to see what the most optimal loyal wingman UCAV will look like in terms of size and complexity.
The XQ-58A is a useful tech demonstrator to begin with but it is yet to be seen if proper loyal wingmen UCAVs will have that footprint and cost profile.
It may end up being that proper loyal wingmen UCAVs will be larger, dimensionally like F-16 sized. Already the Boeing ATS is bigger than the XQ-58A and it too is another tech demonstrator.
That said, I don't have an issue with the idea of UCAVs once they come into fruition and they obviously should be produced in large numbers as well.
But I consider those aircraft to still be force multipliers for manned fighter aircraft and not replacements, because in a high intensity conflict scenario you will still need line of sight control over the tactical decisions that your UCAVs make, and there is likely a golden ratio of manned fighters to UCAVs as well.
You suggest 6 UCAVs per manned fighter.
But what happens when the other side deploys their own UCAVs?
You end up with a UCAV attrition race, where the side with the most UCAVs wins.
Remember that UCAVs are almost analogous to one-shot guided missiles, so these are going to be expended in very large numbers in order to sweep the skies of opposing UCAVs, in order to reach their actual targets.
My theory of future loyal wingman/UCAV augmented air combat is that there will be a golden ratio of UCAVs to manned fighters.
For the purposes of discussion, I raised that number as 6 UCAV per manned fighter.
If both sides deploy UCAVs, it's the size with the larger manned fighter and and larger UCAV fleet at the 1:6 ratio that will likely win, if all else are held equal.
Run the numbers. If the US has 2000 manned stealth fighters with 50 UCAVs each, that is a total of 100,000 UCAVs.
From a budgetary point of view, that is $200B just in procurement costs.
And today, we already see that the US has accepted there won't be large military budget increases.
Plus the US doesn't have the available landmass nor bases in the Western Pacific to field a larger UCAV force than China.
I think the idea that the golden ratio being 50 is ridiculous to begin with so it's kind of a moot point.
At the end of the day, I don't think the maturity and capability of loyal wingmen UCAVs, and the size of the opfor's 5th gen fleet, and the current size of the PLA's 5th gen fleet, is at such a point that it is very useful to talk about "limiting" the size of the PLA's 5th generation procurement in the immediate to medium term future.
The PLA does not have that luxury yet. Perhaps in 5-10 years once loyal wingmen UCAVs do emerge into mature systems then longer term opportunity cost in terms of the optimal balance of manned and unmanned procurement can be debated in more detail -- but the industry's ability to produce many stealthy loyal wingmen UCAVs would be greatly enhanced by having had experience in producing large numbers of 5th gen manned fighters as well.