bd popeye said:
NIONO, Mali (Reuters) - A column of French and Malian armored personnel carriers and supply trucks moved north into the central Malian town of Diabaly early on Monday after the Islamist rebels who were controlling it melted away, security sources said.
Diabaly, 350 km (220 miles) north of the capital Bamako, had harbored the main cluster of rebels south of the front-line towns of Mopti and Sevare until French airstrikes forced them to flee or attempt to blend in with locals, residents said.
"French and Malian forces have advanced to Diabaly and they will continue their mission of securing the town," the deputy commander of Malian forces in nearby Niono, who gave his name only as Captain Samasa, told Reuters. Another security source confirmed the information on condition of anonymity.
(Reporting by Bate Felix and Adama Diarra; Writing by Richard Valdmanis; Editing by Kevin Liffey)
French Navy "Dixmude" LHD to transport French Army's VBCI IFV for deployment in Mali
French Navy "Dixmude" LHD to transport French Army's VBCI IFV for deployment in Mali
As is their normal MO, the "rebels," and Islamic Extremists simply blend in with the locals when the heavy stuff comes out. They will hardly ever go toe to toe with such forces.
When they tried early on against US supported forces (ie. the Northern Alliance) in Afghanistan, they were slaughtered by the thousands by US aircraft and smart weapons.
Now, they will let the French get in there and all set up, running their partols, and then the French will find that those APCs are not armored enough for the IEDs that will be used against them.
The US has had to build a whole new range of vehicles, from transport, to assault, to IED "finders" with very special armored "V" shape designs to safe the lives of the personnel in those vehicles and we have built them now by the thousands.
France will either have to be ready to do the same, or only engage the militants when they can catch them out in the open and not send out these types of patrols.
IMHO, if there is a population center that is supporting the likes of Al Quida and allowing them to hide amongst them...then, as the US did in World War II, if you want military victory that is clear cut, you have to decimate those populations as well until they absolutely want no more and sue for unconditional surrender and give up the insurgents at every turn.
Since World War II the US and Western armies have not really fought this way and the results have been numerous stale mates and quagmires where US and western forces are bled dry until the populations in the west demand that the troops come home.
One exception was the 1st Gulf War where Saddam's armies actually tried to stand and fight and hold their defensive lines. They were slaughtered too.
So IMHO, go in and hit them hard and then leave with the message that you will come back and do it again if they ever try and take up shop, are be prepared to go all out in the war effort and destroy not only the military capabilities of the insurgents, but also all of their support infrastructure...or don't go in.
Just my opinion.