The longer this standoff drags out for, the worse the situation is for both sides of the strait. I am not just referring to the military exercises - they will be over soon - who cares. I am talking about this multi-year standoff between the mainland and Taiwan that will inevitably follow, and having everyone live in fear and anxiety. It is also politically costly for the PRC, because the Taiwan issue is just constantly occupying its military and diplomatic attention. Crimea kind of just disappeared off the radar after Russia took it over quickly in 2014, although Donbass obviously did not. What is the solution for China? I don't know. But to me, the longer this standoff drags out, the worse off everyone is.
It also allows China more time to catch up in places where they're lagging by a lot, like in nuclear submarine technology, it allows more time to develop out and reach true parity with America in things like the sophistication and fleet size of 5th generation fighters, and to solidify their lead in rocketry and missile technology. Assuming China wants to make this less painful and prolonged, I can only see benefits to waiting.Taiwan occupies the attention of the PRC ministry anyway. Dragging this out means they get more practice and experience of real world combined military operations. It also sharpens their focus as they know it could be for real next time.
I really don't see this happening. China probably wants to develop this out as the new normal and let the waning of the news cycle and public interest to naturally de-escalate tensions. I'm not sure I see China deescalating unless they're offered concessions, and American political discourse means that concessions basically can't be offered at this time without torpedoing the political clout of the official that offers it. I guess the American generals can try to offer something?From a diplomatic and economic perspective, yes, a long period of tensions isn't good for both China or Taiwan. So I do expect China to take this win and de-escalate the situation. After all, even Biden and Pelosi are publicly repeating there is only One China.
Yeah, I still don't understand why anyone thinks that is a good idea. If they wanted to defend the democracy and political autonomy of Taiwan, the status quo is the thing that should be maintained. I think for many uninformed but highly political Americans, it's hard to get the concept into their head that sometimes the best thing to do is to not do anything.Plus there will be other crisis in the future anyway, like the US potentially designating Taiwan a formal US military ally next month. And I would call this a red line action even more serious than Pelosi's visit
It'll still be painful regardless. It's just that as time goes on, China as well as sympathetic nations will develop out their industries more and western powers will increasingly have to turn their attentions towards domestic issues. It just seems like the best option, regardless of whether you're China or if you're the pro-Taiwanese democracy faction of America, to just try to kick this bucket down the road. If war starts, democracy is going to die in Taiwan regardless.Economically, this episode pushes Chinese companies to further remove any reliance on foreign technology or foreign supply chains. That applies especially to the emerging technologies of the ongoing Third Industrial Revolution where China has an commanding lead overall.
That should more than compensate for any decoupling effect between China and the West.
Americans are still under the delusion that China is weak and that they can do anything they want.Yeah, I still don't understand why anyone thinks that is a good idea. If they wanted to defend the democracy and political autonomy of Taiwan, the status quo is the thing that should be maintained. I think for many uninformed but highly political Americans, it's hard to get the concept into their head that sometimes the best thing to do is to not do anything.
The obvious answer is that what Americans want isn't what you wroteIf they wanted to defend the democracy and political autonomy of Taiwan, the status quo is the thing that should be maintained
Looks like lithuanian delegations have arrived via commercial plane and looks like tourists lol
I mean, I'd say it depends. I think that our friend Patchwork really is genuine in his desires, but that's not to ignore the fact that there's a considerable amount of Americans that just want to use this opportunity to hurt China and to 'get them back in line' as it were, like they want to try to replicate what they did to Japan with a nuclear-armed state. I have literally seen redditoids say that 90% of the Chinese economy is from exporting to the US (not that 90% of the Chinese economy is exports which would still be wrong, but that 90% of exports go to the US specifically). I think people here put far too much stock in material conditions and much less on the American perception of the Chinese people and government.The obvious answer is that what Americans want isn't what you wrote
Looks like lithuanian delegations have arrived via commercial plane and looks like tourists lol
He can be genuine or not but it doesn't matter because he isn't a policy or decision makerI think that our friend Patchwork really is genuine in his desires