FFG 054/054A Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

oringo

Junior Member
Re: Type 054 FFG status

Any info on the capabilities/features of those bow-mounted sonar? There are too little information about China's sonar technology compared to the radars.
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Type 054 FFG status

None what so ever, at least I haven't found anything (And as attempting it may be to think in the light of this thread about my abilityes to found something, just drop it:nono: :p ;) )
But now we at least know that there is a bowmounted sonar being fitted, which makes me a bit more confidence about the PLANs capabilityes. In fact if my earlier assumption would have prooven out to be true, it would have been really alarming...
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Re: Type 054 FFG status

Ahemmmm..I don't want to start any trouble but I sent that pic to my son who is a USN sonar tech. I just asked him what he thinks of that dome. I will paraphrase his response as soon as I hear from him..OK???
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: Type 054 FFG status

Ahemmmm..I don't want to start any trouble but I sent that pic to my son hwo is a USN sonar tech. I just asked him what he thinks of that dome. I will paraphrase his response as soon as I hear from him..OK???
Just my opinion Popeye...but even thought they have it, it looks somewhat small to me for the size of vessel. Perhaps they have some mintuarization going on, and if they do, bully for them...but just based on that pic, I would say that it may not be as powerful as the sonar on a Burke or, for that matter, on a Halsey, but that's just my opnion.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Re: Type 054 FFG status

Ahemmm..I emailed my son. a Sonar tech on active duty with the USN for 8.5 years. He is a master instructor of advanced USN sonar technology. No bull.

This is what he told me in an email I just recieved. I edited out the email addresses. Take his answer for what you will.

STG2 Fleet Anti-Submarine Warfare Training Center)" <xxxxxxxx> wrote: Subject: RE: Professional opinion please
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:46:21 -0700
From: "xxxx.xxxxx STG2 Fleet Anti-Submarine Warfare Training Center\)" <[email protected]>
To: "<XXXXX.XXXXX>@yahoo.com>

I don’t think so it looks too small. Maybe limited in ablity if it really is sonar. Looks like a toy..sorry...

Yesterday was a good day to be a chargers fan

Luv you

From:XXXXX.XXXXXX [mailto:XXXXXXXxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 12:54
To: XXXXX.XXXXXXXX STG2 Fleet Anti-Submarine Warfare Training Center );
Subject: Professional opinion please

Hey XXXX...I need your professional opinion. This is suposed to be a picture of a bow sonar dome on a new Chinese FFG. What do you think? Doesn't look kind of small to you? Let me know what you think of it! OK???

Chargers kicked azz last night. 9 sacks? Dang that wuz awesome!..Luv Dad!

That is his opinion. If you ever saw the bow sonar dome on a Arliegh Burke, Tico or Spruance you would understand what he is refering to.

This is an artist rendering of a bow sonar dome on an A/B

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Here's a pic of the USS Cole DDG-67. Note the sonar dome on the bow.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

duskylim

Junior Member
VIP Professional
Re: Type 054 FFG status

Dear Guys:

I must agree the bow-mounted sonar on the 054 Frigate seems a little small...
however this may be due to different designs.

I have a feeling that the PLAN sonar tech still emphasizes medium-frequency sonars rather than low-frequency sonars that the US Navy uses. That would account for the smaller size - just in the same way higher frequency radar antennas are smaller than theri low frequency counterparts.

This is probably because the US Navy emphasizes long-range detection in deep seas and oceans while the PLAN focuses on detection in the coastal and littoral areas. It also means that for the time being the PLAN surface fleets have an inshore/brown water outlook.

Just my 2 cents.

Best Regards,

Dusky Lim
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: Type 054 FFG status

Ahemmm...hehehe...did I nail that one or not on the size? My guess is that it is real and that the 054s have a capability, but it is not as powerful as what the Burkes, Ticos, Halseys, Spruances (God rest their souls), etc. have. Unless of course they have done some unbelievable things in miniaturization.

Now I am wondering how big the ones on the new 52Bs, 52Cs, and 51Cs are.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: Type 054 FFG status

I must agree the bow-mounted sonar on the 054 Frigate seems a little small...
however this may be due to different designs.

I have a feeling that the PLAN sonar tech still emphasizes medium-frequency sonars rather than low-frequency sonars that the US Navy uses. That would account for the smaller size - just in the same way higher frequency radar antennas are smaller than theri low frequency counterparts.

This is probably because the US Navy emphasizes long-range detection in deep seas and oceans while the PLAN focuses on detection in the coastal and littoral areas. It also means that for the time being the PLAN surface fleets have an inshore/brown water outlook.
Great comments. Probably very true as regards the PLAN dome on the 054, short of some significant miniaturization that would shock analysts everywhere. I'd be interested in seeing the new PLAN DDGs (52B, 52C, 51C).. BTW, The US Navy does both.
 

Gollevainen

Colonel
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: Type 054 FFG status

Well if PLAN is going to go for the bluewater naval presence, it should focus on longrange detection sonars. A workable ASW is cruisal if china ever wish to field a true carrier taskforce, as the deadliest thread for all big ships nowadays comes form under the sea. And aircraft carriers aren't exactly the usefull in coastal waters...
 

zyun8288

Junior Member
Re: Type 054 FFG status

Nice analysis on the bow sonar. In fact, several years ago when 526's frontal picture was leaked out, there were several discussion which came to the same conclusion: it's pretty small, and the guess was it aimed at shallow waters. But unfortunetely, the public materials on china's underwater R&D is even less, impossible to make any convicing conclusion. Also we all hoped to see the underwater section of 052B/C, but it's too late.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top