Yes that is what I said. Those Harriers could land and take off from any suitably sized helideck, even with stores under the wings. That does not make the ship an 'Aircraft Carrier'. During the Falklands War Sea Harriers landed, refuelled and launched vertically from the LPDs Fearless and Intrepid in San Carlos water. They didn't become Aircraft carriers by virtue of doing this. I stand by what I said, Atlantic Conveyor was an Auxiliary Aircraft Transport, with NO maintenance facilities, No ability to rearm or refuel aircraft on board. It's well known and acknowledged that when taking off vertically, the Harrier family is severely restricted in both fuel and payload, hence the rolling take off and ski jump method normally employed. The Shars and Harriers transported south on Atlantic Conveyor as well as all the helicopters on board were never intended to be 'operated' from the ship, they would simply be flown off on arrival, the Shars and Harriers going straight to the carriers and the helicopters would have been flown ashore once she arrived off the landing beaches.Harrier taking off from Atlantic conveyor
Harriers on the deck of Atlantic conveyor
uhmmm ....not an aircraft carrier......but still harrier were landing and taking off from her deck with hardpoints and stores on them, but not an aircraft carrier
I transported a helicopter several years ago on the back of a 45ft semi trailer. At no time did it become an 'Aircraft Carrier' in the accepted meaning of the term. As stated in my previous post, the MVs Astronomer, Atlantic Causeway and Contender Bezant did receive hangars and maintenance facilities to OPERATE helicopters and served as Auxiliary ASW Helicopter Carriers with the Task Force, but even then none of them had facilities for Sea Harriers beyond refuelling them if necessary. No munitions for the Shars were carried by these ships and they had no runway or ski jump fitted, so the term Aircraft carrier does not apply.