First the Image isn’t verified yet. Second the USN is looking at recovery options. This literally just happened it’s not like anyone just keeps recovery equipment capable of pulling aircraft out of the sea on hot standby. It takes time to locate,assemble, assess, plan and recover. It took weeks from the 11/17 loss till 12/7 announced recovery. How far down the plane is is going to be a huge factor. Is it shallow or deep.
Next in the case of the P3 incident they were literally in China on the ground. It’s a hell of a lot easier to get inside a jet on a landing strip then one in the middle of the pacific.
I think my question would be better posed as, who makes the call to attempt recovery or destroy? The BBC article did seem to imply that it was salvageable regardless of the photo.
What is the contingency plan?
Obviously with the P3 it was known that you were going to end up in “non-friendly” territory, and with this case it is more ambiguous, but there must be some idea whether you can scramble recovery assets before the PLA can get there