Jura The idiot
General
IOC by the Numbers
7/28/2016
and let's see EDIT this year if History Repeats Itself:
Jul 5, 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
7/28/2016
There are 222 F-35A maintainers at Hill AFB, Utah, now, and 150 more are in the pipeline, handily beating requirements for initial operational capability for the new fighter, Lt. Col. Steven Anderson, 388th Maintenance Group deputy commander, told reporters in a telecon Wednesday. The , which has been problematic in recent months, is up to the task of supporting a six-ship deployment, as required for IOC, he said, and will improve in the months and years to come. There are a combined 21 Active Duty and Reserve pilots certified—and three more nearly certified—“combat mission ready” in the air-to-air, close air support, interdiction, and “limited” suppression of enemy air defense missions, he reported. The CAS profile is similar to that flown by F-16s in Afghanistan in recent years, Lt. Col. George Watkins, 34th FS commander said, with GPS-guided and laser-guided bombs. The 34th Fighter Squadron has actually overflown its allotted flying hours by 14.5 percent “because of the increased reliability of the Low-Rate Initial Production Lot 7 and 8 aircraft,” and nine of the 15 aircraft serving with the unit were delivered early, Anderson added. Maintainers and depot workers at Hill worked “158 days … nonstop” to achieve IOC on time by Aug. 1, he said, and completed necessary modifications to the initial 12 aircraft “33 days ahead of schedule.” The timeline for for real-world missions will be up to ACC chief Gen. Hawk Carlisle, but the unit is ready, Watkins said.
and let's see EDIT this year if History Repeats Itself:
Jul 5, 2016
OK this time, with F-35, quote, handily beating requirements, end of quote, I'm on high alertJul 3, 2015
in the meantime, I was (almost) fooled by
after F-35B IOC was described as such a success in
F-35 OT-1 By the Numbers
while later the hard data were obtained (), made available in
which you may (and some of you won'tread to check this graphics:
![]()
which is yet another
F-35 OT-1 By the Numbers
so I have been skeptical about the official success stories, as in (recent examples posted here):
Jun 23, 2016
from inside: "... 88 sorties ... Seven F-35As ... June 6-17 ..." deployment, so it's, on average, almost exactly, one sortie per one day per one aircraft ... with no info about the duration of those flights
Wednesday at 2:06 PM
from inside: "... the squadron received its first two F-35B aircraft on May 9 — three days after it completed its final flights with the Harrier. Officials did not immediately respond to a request about when the remaining joint strike fighters made by Lockheed Martin Corp. would join the squadron. ..." so in my opinion, the headline is pathetic
is all this just the business as usual? LOL
Last edited: