I don't know if he's right, but it's definitely a reasonable assumption. It's a bit hard for some people to wrap their heads around the F-35 being one of the best fighter planes in the world and being seriously flawed at the same time. But I think that it's still very important to remember what Lockheed Martin wants: if the F-35 program is a never-ending money pit, then that's only good news for them, so why would they want to change anything?Gus gives a concise explanation of the current TR3/Block 4 woes and offers a meta-reason for them - "technical debt".
100% upgradability for F-35 ??? It's a joke right ? It's not even capable to get upgraded to his promised capabilities...F-35 beat Gripen fighter jet 'by a mile' in 2021 Defence Department competition
If he succeeds in keeping F-35 out of the hands of SA and Turkey, they'll eventually just go with Chinese offerings.
Imagine if some years later we hear of another J-10/Rafael type story, but this time with J-35/F-35 instead.If he succeeds in keeping F-35 out of the hands of SA and Turkey, they'll eventually just go with Chinese offerings.
With hopefully similar outcome as the j10>raf oneImagine if some years later we hear of another J-10/Rafael type story, but this time with J-35/F-35 instead.
According to the report, the average availability rate of F-35s was 50% because "(the Pentagon) did not always hold Lockheed Martin accountable for poor performance related to F-35 sustainment."