F-15 Eagle Thread

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: F-16 Falcon Thread

On the Eagles, I believe those CFTs mount to all versions. Although only the Strike Eagles use them on a regular basis. The ones stationed on Iceland earlier were the only C models to regularly fly them, due to the ranges involved. Or so I seem to remember.
The CFTs, along the sides of the aircraft aft of the intakes, were an intregl part of the F-15E design. To my knowledge, you will not find any F-15Es without them.

Some people occasionally mistake F-15Bs or F-15Ds for the "E" but those are the two-seat training versions of the single seat aircraft, and not the F-15E. As I say, the "E" is also capable of the air superiority role and is used on occasion to accomplish it.

I do not recall ever seeing any of the single seat F-15As or F-15Cs with CFTs. Have you got any pictures of them? That would be very interesting to see.

I will move these posts to that thread...please respond there for th F-15 question.
 

Scratch

Captain
Re: F-16 Falcon Thread

The CFTs, along the sides of the aircraft aft of the intakes, were an intregl part of the F-15E design. To my knowledge, you will not find any F-15Es without them.

Some people occasionally mistake F-15Bs or F-15Ds for the "E" but those are the two-seat training versions of the single seat aircraft, and not the F-15E. As I say, the "E" is also capable of the air superiority role and is used on occasion to accomplish it.

I do not recall ever seeing any of the single seat F-15As or F-15Cs with CFTs. Have you got any pictures of them? That would be very interesting to see.

There you go, Jeff. First three should be single-seaters, including an israeli one. The last is an E with CFT detached.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


5x6h79.jpg


epp26a.jpg


2ch511t.jpg


I also haven't seen Strike Eagles fly without them. They're not actually integral to the design, though. I guess just carried as standard because the they need the gas and those CFTs provide extra hardpoints.
They still induce a small drag & weight penalty, so that's why the pure air superiority versions normally don't carry them, exept for the former 57th FS, I think, out of Keflavik.

The E certainly is a very capable A-A platform as well. Actually, I always thought there's no structural differences between these anyways. But that the E is a D with those conformal fuel tanks as standard, as well as new radar and avionics / software to suit it's new mission.
 
Last edited:
Re: F-16 Falcon Thread

The CFTs, along the sides of the aircraft aft of the intakes, were an intregl part of the F-15E design. To my knowledge, you will not find any F-15Es without them.

Some people occasionally mistake F-15Bs or F-15Ds for the "E" but those are the two-seat training versions of the single seat aircraft, and not the F-15E. As I say, the "E" is also capable of the air superiority role and is used on occasion to accomplish it.

I do not recall ever seeing any of the single seat F-15As or F-15Cs with CFTs. Have you got any pictures of them? That would be very interesting to see.

I will move these posts to that thread...please respond there for th F-15 question.

I'm building a 1/48 F-15E to the greatest detail I can(gonna be my signature work), so I had done a lot of research. The CFT can be detached from the Strike Eagles but I suppose only when it's for maintanence. Otherwise you will always only see them with CFT attached. There's a photo that you can see actually

As a guy obsessed with air dominance and ruling the skies with air superiority/supremacy, I didn't like the Strike Eagle much in the beginning because I felt it's too ground-based. However once I begin to feel how it's technically a Super Saiyan F-15 that can attack ground but also keeping its air combat capabilities, I just love this bird. From its gunship grey schemes to its modernized avionics and MFD cockpit to more powerful F229 engines that requires side intake mounted on the CFT, it's just beautiful.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: F-16 Falcon Thread

There you go, Jeff. First three should be single-seaters, including an israeli one. The last is an E with CFT detached.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


5x6h79.jpg


The E certainly is a very capable A-A platform as well. Actually, I always thought there's no structural differences between these anyways. But that the E is a D with those conformal fuel tanks as standard, as well as new radar and avionics / software to suit it's new mission.
Thanks!

Wow, great pics. I knew Isreal had added CFTs, and am glad to see them on other single seat aircraft as well! Learn something new every day...but it makes perfect sense.

However, the only modified F-15s of any sort that were used as a part of the F-15E program was the technology demonstrator in 1980, which was a modified F-15A with CFTs and a Pave Tack laser designator, and the first prototype, which was a modifed F-15B.

These was in response to the USAF Tactical All Weather Requirement Study in 1979 I believe, followed by the Enhanced Tactical Fighter (ETF) program to replace the F-111s in 1980, I believe. The F-15E proposal won, and all F-15Es thereafter were new builds.

This is because the follow on prototypes and production aircraft had to meet the ETF requirements which required some significant structural changes.

The aft fuselage was redesigned to accommodate the much more powerful engines. This required all new engine bays and access panels that used new, lighter, but strong Superplastic forming and diffusion bonding technologies.

In addition, the forward fuselage was redesigned to accommodate the new Weapons System Officer back seat station which was very much changed over the B and D training configuration.

The new station had to accommodate the ability or the WSO to operate the new air-to-ground avionics, using multiple MFDs to check radar, electronic warfare, infrared sensors, aircraft & weapons status and threats. He also selects targets, and navigates with an electronic map display. Finally, they retained the ability for the WSO to fly the aircraft with his own stick and throttle if necessary

The two conformal tanks are carried on all F-15Es and each can carry an additional 750 gallons of fuel, I believe. Those tanks are removable for service and maintenance, just as you show...but I do not believe any F-15E, to my knowledge, flies any mission without them.

Six additional hard points were added, in two tandem rows of three for more weapons, and strengthening measures were taken in the wings and fuselage to accommodate the heavier weapons load and provide safety margins for them.

All of this is in addition to the tactical electronic warfare system (TEWS), an externally mounted ALQ-131 ECM pod when required, the APG-70 radar system allowing the crew to detect ground targets from longer ranges (which is being replaced by the AN/APG-82(v)1 Active Electronically Scanned Array Radar (AESA) radar, the low-altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night (LANTIRN) system mounted under the intakes, etc., etc.

Great aircraft...and also able to still handle all the air to ir duties!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Re: F-15 Thread

I'm building a 1/48 F-15E to the greatest detail I can(gonna be my signature work), so I had done a lot of research.
Great!

Please post a thread here on SD in the members club about your build.

Would love to see it.

Which kit? Or is it a scratch build?

I did a Monogram F-15E some years ago in 1/72 scale...sorry, a little dusty.


attachment.php

 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    60.8 KB · Views: 70
Re: F-15 Thread

Great!

Please post a thread here on SD in the members club about your build.

Would love to see it.

Which kit? Or is it a scratch build?

I did a Monogram F-15E some years ago in 1/72 scale...sorry, a little dusty.


attachment.php

I'm building te Revell 1/48 F-15E. It's the only real F-15E kit out there built and designed from scratch and not a modified F-15B/D. Apparently it's so good quality, it is an accurate Desert Storm Mudhen without requiring too much aftermarket correction. For most recent Mudhens, few aftermarket parts and minor adjustments can suffice too. Anyhow I won't let out too many secrets. I will explain everything in greater detail, especially what I have done, when I complete it. I almost assure, it will be one of the more accurate recent Mudhens you guys will get to see(except the payload combination because my name is "air superiority" so I'm still a lot more about air lethality and will fly my bird for purpose of blowing people out of the skies first.)
 

Scratch

Captain
Just in case someone is interested, there's a nice article on defenseindustrydaily.com detailing the advances in radars on the different F-15 models.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Radar Refits: F-15s Looking for the AESA Edge
Jul 17, 2014 15:40 UTC by Defense Industry Daily staff

Most F-15C Eagle air superiority fighters use APG-63 radars, passive arrays mounted on a movable swashplate. While upgrades over the years have improved them, a new generation of radar technologies has appeared. With cruise missile defense rising in importance, and longer-range detection desired, upgrades are necessary. That requires new radars, using AESA technologies that dramatically improve range, while reducing maintenance. The USAF has also discussed a retrofit set that would turn the F-15C Eagles into multi-role fighters, and a next-generation AESA radar would be part of that, too. Meanwhile, they’ve started a program to upgrade select F-15C units with AESA radars, as an air-air improvement.

Those F-15C units will now be joined by the USAF’s entire 2-seat, multi-role F-15E Strike Eagle fleet, whose future AESA radar has received some improvements, and a new designation.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
F-15 C crashed today in Virginia. In the video the reporter says F-16 tho

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Praying that the pilot was able to eject, at very high altitude and likely at very high speed as he was cross-country on a ferry flight to deliver the aircraft for a radar conversion??? The high speed is a problem, and we def are praying that he was able to eject safely???
 
Top