Wow I don't get it, the Warring State and Qin and Legalism stuff is actually pretty good and accurate, yet the rest is so far off the mark it's like as if the article is written by two different people.If you thought this was bad, read this written by a supposed think tank 8 years ago.
Perhaps this guy only has interest in Chinese history and doesn't normally give a damn about contemporary Chinese stuff but thought for a change he could use his historical knowledge to make a point about today?