CV-18 Fujian/003 CATOBAR carrier thread

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
But it can also be argued Chinese engines are at this stage probably not mature enough for the single engine carrier demands, especially for the corrosive environment. Even the J-15 doesn't use the WS-10 as far as we know, instead opting for a corrosion resistant naval AL-31 variant.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
A-4, F-8, AV-8 ... single engined

That is because American hold such an overwhelming air dominance after the WWII that all they have to do is park the AC close to the target and then launch those jet. But now with the proliferation of cheap surface to surface missile, cruise missile it will be crazy to do that. They have to park the AC the limit of the foe's missile range
 

Intrepid

Major
But now with the proliferation of cheap surface to surface missile, cruise missile it will be crazy to do that. They have to park the AC the limit of the foe's missile range
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of longer range over water.

It is possible that the Chinese are not so generous with their crews and only design multi-engine carrier aircraft.
 

nastya1

Junior Member
Registered Member
There are separate threads for J-10 and JF-17, you can discuss over there if you think your interests make sense.
Arent those land based?
I am talk about the main weapon systems of the AC . so you think they are not relevant?
 

nastya1

Junior Member
Registered Member
Single engine fighter is not suitable for naval air wing for the simple fact they have to fly long distance over water. And if anything, happened to the engine you will be gone there is no spare engine that allow you to get back to the AC.
Another thing you need long reach and can carry a lot of missile, etc. Single engine is limited in reach and MTO
So, nobody uses single engine fighter for naval aviation!
Navalized J10 range is over 1000 miles so if it venture out 400 miles shouldnt that be sufficient?

WS10 is a mature engine now.
 
Top