CV-18 Fujian/003 CATOBAR carrier thread

Hendrik_2000

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
asif iqbal said:
Hendrik the Chinese fanboy is back with his silly posts

maybe you didn't know but a ice breaker is not considered a warship

in basic English a ice breaker does not constitute a warship
Click to expand...

aship is a ship you said that is uneconomical to built ship with nuclear proplusion less than 75000 ton What is the difference in economic between warship and civilian ship as fas as operating cost they are the same Some people does not use their logic here or lack of it
 
Intrepid

Intrepid

Major
An icebreaker can sometimes get stuck longer than planned. And the fuel consumption can multiply with very thick ice. For this reason, different rules apply to nuclear power plants for icebreakers than for other ships.
 
Hendrik_2000

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Intrepid said:
An icebreaker can sometimes get stuck longer than planned. And the fuel consumption can multiply with very thick ice. For this reason, different rules apply to nuclear power plants for icebreakers than for other ships.
Click to expand...

But majority of ice breaker are non nuclear how you explain that !. I though the real reason why nuclear is preferrable because if they got stuck at least they have power and not froze to death because lack of heat specially for Russia with large ice zone in their northern border
 
Intrepid

Intrepid

Major
If icebreakers are not far from bases, they can be supplied from the air or evacuated if necessary. This does not apply to an icebreaker that is supposed to keep the north passage clear and remains in the ice for weeks.
 
Deino

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
ok, guys ... enough off topic of if or if an Icebreaker is a warship, if this is or is not related to carriers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top