CV-18 Fujian/003 CATOBAR carrier thread

TOKYO DRIFT ABC

Junior Member
Registered Member
Kuznetsov is NOT a CATOBAR type carrier
I never knew PLAN was ever going to build anymore stobar carriers.
Even as far back as late 2000s we've always speculated that they would at most stopped after 2 which they did with Shandong.
BTW CATOBAR is an acronym.. in real live navy speak, nobody calls it 'catobar.' At least not in.the USN.
It's only in written form.
@popeye you ever heard anyone call carriers catobar?
I didn't say it right! I just wanted to say that the Kuznetsov-based design has reached its limits.
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
I think it’s a fair conclusion, given there’s no evidence to suggest otherwise. The island and the stern are just evolved from the Kuz.
Fujian is 20k ton heavier, with new electrical systems and wirings for three cats and a much smaller island. It likely has more powerful electric generators and bigger steam turbines. The internals are likely to have changed a lot from Liaoning and Shandong. Like Blitzo said, "derived" is more appropriate. Calling it a Kuznetsov dead-end is also not right.
 

Rag Shiba

New Member
Registered Member
Fujian is 20k ton heavier, with new electrical systems and wirings for three cats and a much smaller island. It likely has more powerful electric generators and bigger steam turbines. The internals are likely to have changed a lot from Liaoning and Shandong. Like Blitzo said, "derived" is more appropriate. Calling it a Kuznetsov dead-end is also not right.
We are on the same page. The word “based on” has a pretty lose meaning depending on who you ask.
 
Top