youngtomous
Junior Member
CCTV Weibo why you can believe it? Many times they put the F16 picture but the news is all about J10. CV17 is still in the shipyard.
CV-17 Shandong (002 carrier) Thread I ...News, Views and operations
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
- Status
You're right. The more I think of it the less likely it appears to be. And it's only CCTV weibo.
Hendrik_2000
Lieutenant General
Via clarkgap
Boiler tested after the AESA was installed:
Boiler tested after the AESA was installed:
Generally, as was the case with the Liaoning, when they begin testing the engines at dock side like this, they are getting much closer to the initial builders trials at sea.Via clarkgap
Boiler tested after the AESA was installed:
How long?
Cannot say...but I would say at this point that we are talking about weeks instead of months, as in maybe 6-8 weeks or even less and not 6-8 months.
But time will tell.
As you are new here and we had not had conversation, so I want to make it clear that I don't intend to poke you on your post.
And apologize beforehand if it looks so.That been said, I would advise you to be more critical when referring these sources that you provided.
- The two articles from stheadline and singtao are copy/paste of one another if you read them. That makes them very not respectful. And it reduce the sources to only one.
- The title of the tianya post clearly states 辟谣：航母海试，央视乌龙 which means: Rebut rumor, CV sea trail, (is) CCTV mess-up.
- The post then states at the end: 港媒原引ccav乌龙贴 which means: Hong Kong media quoted CCAV (slang for CCTV) mess-up blog post (CCTV weibo account).
Understood and won't jump next time. That's why I like this place and sorry if I polluted it a little...!As you are new here and we had not had conversation, so I want to make it clear that I don't intend to poke you on your post.
That been said, I would advise you to be more critical when referring these sources that you provided.
- The two articles from stheadline and singtao are copy/paste of one another if you read them. That makes them very not respectful. And it reduce the sources to only one.
- The title of the tianya post clearly states 辟谣：航母海试，央视乌龙 which means: Rebut rumor, CV sea trail, (is) CCTV mess-up.
- The post then states at the end: 港媒原引ccav乌龙贴 which means: Hong Kong media quoted CCAV (slang for CCTV) mess-up blog post (CCTV weibo account).
Pardon, but IMO Russian sites and the term "reliable source" for Chinese matters simply don't fit.
- Status