CV-16 Liaoning (001 carrier) Thread II ...News, Views and operations

Status
Not open for further replies.

vesicles

Colonel
Actually, paradoxically, high blood pressure might actually be beneficial for fighter pilots.

Most hard manoeuvres fighters pull are positive-G, which means blood drains from the brain into the legs. So high blood pressure means that blood drains slower, giving the pilot a precious few more seconds/ degrees before they start greying out from lack of oxygen to the brain.

High blood pressure would be very bad for negative-g manoeuvres where blood pools in the head. And that is where they might have a higher risk of burst blood vessels in the brain and eyes (which is why it is called red-out).

So maybe the trick to fighting Russians is to favour negative-g manoeuvres :p

Hahaha! Nice idea!!

Well, this would work if these pilots only have to pull positive G's once a year. Doing it on a regular basis won't help them. Keep in mind that the cause of high blood pressure is inflamed blood vessels, which contain blockage and lose elasticity. Constantly expanding and shrinking blood vessels during aggressive maneuvering, either positive or negative G's will put so much pressure on the blood vessels. That's why I mentioned aneurysm. And another side effect of less physically fit pilot would be enlarged heart...

Fit pilots have no problem doing any of these because their healthy blood vessels can take the abuse and recover quickly. They can afford to intentionally force the blood into the brain for a few seconds during positive G's.

Draining blood from the brain too slowly also means so much blood being stuck in the brain for too long. That might cause internal bleeding in the brain. A handful of kids die from this annually while riding roller coasters.
 

bruceb1959

Junior Member
Registered Member
I found some more bellies & younger Russian pilots......

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


4VlqWzu.jpg
no wonder they build their planes so big! :rolleyes:
 

delft

Brigadier
It doesn't look like the Russians are taking carrier aviation as seriously as the US and China does. Therefor very little investments.
OT
Even just the European NATO members spend nearly four times as much on defence than Russia and nearly half of Russian defence spending is on other areas than Europe so it is no wonder that some parts of the navy are neglected.
 

Intrepid

Major
Even just the European NATO members spend nearly four times as much on defence than Russia ...
They have to spend ten times to get the same value because military equipment in the west is very expensive and the companies who offer the equipment earn a lot of money.
 

Richard Santos

Captain
Registered Member
It doesn't look like the Russians are taking carrier aviation as seriously as the US and China does. Therefor very little investments.
This is attributable to the overall underfunded state of the Russian navy.

Russia really can't afford a great power navy centered around 50,000 ton carriers.
 

Richard Santos

Captain
Registered Member
They have to spend ten times to get the same value because military equipment in the west is very expensive and the companies who offer the equipment earn a lot of money.

I am not sure that is true. In the west, military equipment cost is both more transparent, and more people scrutinize the publicized cost of military equipment to ensure that the total cost, including R&D and other indirect costs, are included, and not just passed unknown to the public to the economy to make the public think the cost of the equipment is less than they truly are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top