Crisis in the Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
What he is saying is that MA17 could not have been shot down by a Rebel unit because The Telegraph's suspected point of Launch which is in Rebel Territory ( call it Site Red ) Is to far way from the point of the Crash site. There For according to his logic the missile must have been launched form another location and he automatically points to Russian satellite images with a Ukranian Buk ( call it Site Yellow)
What he is not considering is that the point of Impact with the Ground is not the same as the point of intercept and that a Boeing 777 is not necessarily going to drop form the sky straight down.
 

solarz

Brigadier
Two points established (beyond reasonable doubts, thanks to the Telegraph) ) and could be seen on space photos:
crash site and (most probable) rebel launch site. Crash site is on the edge of Buk horizontal range coverage.
Boeing was hit even further west
- disintegration trail is about 15 to 17 km plus.
Which means that fired from (supposed) site within rebel controlled territory Buk missile simply could not reach the incoming plane.
Russian Ministry of Defense demonstrated space photos of temporary field position of two Ukrainian Buk launchers 12 km south-west of Torez. Ukrainian Buks were observed there right before the tragedy and disappeared the next day.
Their position fits nicely within the striking range of Buk missiles and (most) probable missile hit point.

What he is saying is that MA17 could not have been shot down by a Rebel unit because The Telegraph's suspected point of Launch which is in Rebel Territory ( call it Site Red ) Is to far way from the point of the Crash site. There For according to his logic the missile must have been launched form another location and he automatically points to Russian satellite images with a Ukranian Buk ( call it Site Yellow)
What he is not considering is that the point of Impact with the Ground is not the same as the point of intercept and that a Boeing 777 is not necessarily going to drop form the sky straight down.

No actually, he's saying the opposite. The crash site is on the edge of the rebel Buk range, and considering the disintegration trail, the point of missile impact would've been out of rebel Buk range.

I'm assuming here that Nicky means the *western* edge, as I haven't seen the video.
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Ukrainian 79th airmobile brigade:
[video=youtube;NwOIc6Dbls0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwOIc6Dbls0[/video]

Some pictures from Colonel Cassad's site

2w6c4f8.jpg

33k3ac3.jpg

vx0w93.jpg

ke86px.jpg

292mwrl.jpg

264swlk.jpg

2v1pu6c.jpg

vhqmhz.jpg

2lc1com.jpg

2ykbaio.jpg


I also find myself wondering about the timing of the collapse of the Coup Appointed Government.
Could it possibly be the realisation that some very "awkward" facts will soon enter the public domain about the downing of KH17 and that people are now bailing out as fast as they can?
 

nicky

Junior Member
solarz and TerraN_EmpirE:

Buk is a compex that consists of several vehicles. So far we see reports and pictures of only a single self-propelled launcher (SPL). In oder to be effective it also needs a self-propelled radar called Kupol (to see far, detect&identify targets, provide direction for SPL) and a self-propelled command post for overall coordination and control. SPL has it's own radar and possibly can do without Kupol but in this case it's capabilities are very limited.

As I told earlier even full Buk complex can barely reach out for the crash site from the launch point discovered by a Telegraph reporter. It means that the actual missile hit point is even farther away and is certainly beyond Buk complex's reach. For the single Buk SPL it was simply impossible to hit the Boeing from the found position.

Russian space pictures show two Ukrainian Buk SPLs temporarily fielded on the edge of rebels' control territory. Their work is supported by at least two Ukrainian full Buk complexes including Kupol radars. They comfortably track air corridor for high flying civilian planes in the area. The two separate SPLs's firing range fit nicely into the probable hit point of the Boeing. They both disappear immediately after the crash. Why?

Although rebels were unable to hit the Boeing, the launch site bears evidence of the missile launch (scorched earth, plastic fragments, etc.). Here we need to go back to the evidence presented at the press-conference and interviews with locals immediately after the crash. Both sources say that Boeing was followed by a Su-25 which in the end circled around crash site for a while (to see what had happened). At that moment this enemy target could have been detected by rebels and fired at with their single SPL.

Unfortunately, neither Ukraine nor US presented any evidence so far to support their claims. Which might be considered suggestive.
 

nicky

Junior Member
Breaking news: Ukraine admitted that they shot the Boeing by mistake exactly they way described by me in the previous post.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Breaking news: Ukraine admitted that they shot the Boeing by mistake exactly they way described by me in the previous post.

Nicky, supply a link.
I just checked Fox news, The BBC, CNN, Al Jazirra, and RT. If Ukraine made a statement like that it should be headline. Especially for RT as they would use it to justify everything but what did I find? No confirmation.

I did find this story.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

about a mass grave found by Ukrainian government forces in former rebel territory. I saw the Reports from state on Russia shelling Ukraine. I saw a report on far right groups. I saw not a single word of Ukraine saying it was responsible for MA17.
 

Sputnik

New Member
DNR forces

120 mm mortar
[video=youtube;RbrnHCLSZ-4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbrnHCLSZ-4[/video]
SPG-9
[video=youtube;AjCoyLY1pC0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjCoyLY1pC0[/video]
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Voice of America no report, Voice of Russia no report. Peoples Daily no report. Santa's Morning Naughty list.. Okay I made that up.
what I did find a report
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

but it says it was a Pro Russian militia That fired.
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Now this is interesting

This is a video broadcast from the BBC's Russian Language service. It follows a BBC reporter as they go looking for the militia BUK that shot down MH17.
The broadcast was apparently pulled and the video deleted by the BBC, but not before it was preserved on Google Webcache and reloaded onto YouTube.
The problem is stated, that all the local civilian eye witnesses are very clear that a military jet was following the Air Liner and even that it was responsible for shooting it down.
The Video is in Russian, but links and a translation have been carried on the Saker Website

Youtube video link
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Google cache link
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Transcript of the BBC Video Report

DPR Representative: Here it is.

Olga Ivshina, BBC: The black boxes from the crashed Boeing are finally being transferred into the hands of the experts. However, how much can they tell us?

The recorders logged the coordinates and the heading of the aircraft at the time of the incident and may have recorded the sound of the explosion. However, they will not tell us what exactly caused the explosion.

The inhabitants of the nearby villages are certain that they saw military aircraft in the sky shortly prior to the catastrophe. According to them, it actually was the jet fighters that brought down the Boeing.

Eyewitness #1: There were two explosions in the air. And this is how it broke apart. And [the fragments] blew apart like this, to the sides. And when …

Eyewitness #2: … And there was another aircraft, a military one, beside it. Everybody saw it.

Eyewitness #1: Yes, yes. It was flying under it, because it could be seen. It was proceeding underneath, below the civilian one.

Eyewitness #3: There were sounds of an explosion. But they were in the sky. They came from the sky. Then this plane made a sharp turn-around like this. It changed its trajectory and headed in that direction [indicating the direction with her hands].

Olga Ivshina, BBC: The Ukrainian government rejects this version of events. They believe that the Boeing was shot down using a missile from a “BUK” complex that came in from the direction of Russia.

Vitaliy Naida, Department of Counterintelligence of SBU [Ukrainian Security Service]: This was a BUK M1 system from which the aircraft was shot down. It came to Ukraine early in the morning on the 17th of July. It was delivered by a tow truck to the city of Donetsk. After that, it was redeployed from Donetsk, as part of a column of military equipment, to the area of the city of Torez, to the area of Snezhnoye, to the area of Pervomaisk.

Olga Ivshina, BBC: The Ukrainian Security Service has published photographs and a video, which, in its opinion, prove that the Boeing was shot down with a “BUK” missile. We attempted to verify these photographs and information at the location.

One of the photographs showed a landscape not far from the city of Torez, on which smoke could be seen coming from the presumed location of the missile’s launch. We attempted to find this location, and it appears that we were successful.

We are now on the outskirts of the city of Torez. Behind me, approximately five kilometres away, is the city of Snezhnoye. And the landscape here matches the landscape that we can see on the photograph published by the Ukrainian Security Service.

To find the place from which the smoke was allegedly coming from, we adopted as markers these three poplars and the group of trees. Presumably, this is the place that can be seen on the photograph published by the SBU. And here are our markers: the three solitary poplars and the small group of trees in the distance.

The smoke that can be seen on the photograph came from somewhere over there [pointing behind her], behind my back. The SBU believes that this is a trace coming from the launch of a “BUK” missile.

However, it must be noted that there are here, approximately in the same place, the Saur-Mogila memorial, near which the fighting continues almost unabated, and a coalmine. It turns out that the smoke with the same degree of probability could have been coming from any of these locations.

Having circled around the nearby fields, we were unable to find any traces of a missile launch. Nor did the local inhabitants that we encountered see any “BUK” either.

At the ruins of an apartment building in the city of Snezhnoye, the topic of the jet fighters that may have been escorting civilian aircraft comes up again. A bomb dropped from above took away the lives of eleven civilians here.

Sergey Godovanets, Commander of the Militia of the city of Snezhnoye: They use these civilian aircraft to hide behind them. It is only now that they stopped flying over us – but, usually, civilian aircraft would always fly above us. And they hide [behind them]. [The experience in] Slavyansk had demonstrated that they would fly out from behind a civilian aircraft, bomb away, and then hide, once again, behind the civilian aircraft and fly away.

Olga Ivshina, BBC: The commander of the local militia emphasizes that they have no weaponry capable of shooting down a jet fighter [flying] at a significant height. However, he says that if such weaponry were to appear, they would have tried to.

Sergey Godovanets: If we know that it is not a civilian aircraft, but a military one, then – yes.

Olga Ivshina, BBC: So, could the Boeing have been shot down by the militias that had mistaken it for a military aircraft? There is as yet no unequivocal confirmation of either this or any other version [of what took place]. The international experts are just beginning their work with the information obtained from the crashed airliner. It now appears that it is difficult to overstate the importance of this investigation. Olga Ivshina, BBC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top