It does not absolve the guilt of atrocities committed by others and is not relevant to the situation in Ukraine.
Mr. Janiz makes no attempt to absolve any one, he calls for a "forensics team" in order to get to the truth.
It does not absolve the guilt of atrocities committed by others and is not relevant to the situation in Ukraine.
T2, reading your response to Mr Janiz very succinct response, that he was and is questioning the wisdom of taking the "flip" Russian accusation against the Ukrainians, and pointing out that the Russians have a history of this type of heinous act, on a massive scale is most certainly relevant, when they are prime suspects themselves..
The OCSE monitors are involved and they are able to supervise the investigation. There was no question of blindly believing Russian publications.Mr. Janiz makes no attempt to absolve any one, he calls for a "forensics team" in order to get to the truth.
Yes, I think that Russian press is not a reliable source of informations and you need at least one doctor/coroner to confirm that. Groundless informations are for no use in the public. You need to use confirmed arguments.
Satisfied? I haven't seen any written report from such a body so far. And yes - Russians haven't blinked an eye murdering thousands of people with a single shot in the back of the head in organised mass murders which they tried to hide from the world in the XX century history. And I bet you know about that.
If you're not satisfied with this answer then ban me for two weeks.
We have outside evidence on MH17. If in a densely populated area nobody has heard the launch of a missile, whose launch should have been heard within a distance of 10 km and a US satellite that looks for the launch of missiles didn't see such a launch we can safely assume there was no launch ( US secret service people told US journalists they didn't have evidence ). That leave that MH17 was shot down by an aircraft.I am no expert, but I can't help wondering if forensics will expose the perpetrators. Are they going to say such a kind of wound is made by a 7.56 or 5.56 bullet? What has the MH17 investigation proven so far? It is not able to point any finger. Especially not when flight recorders and control tower recordings are still kept secret. I am afraid both sides will lie through their teeth about their involvement without tying DNA to the perpetrators.