Statistically there will always be edge cases. For example, the head scientist of the Sinovac trial in Indonesia died of COVID, and other doctors were known to be hospitalized when Sinovac was the only available vaccine there at the time. Sinovac also has a higher risk of Bell’s palsy. Again, these are edge cases. Also, I don’t agree that your post debunks anything I said, as my posts mention increased autoimmune effects after mRNA and I never received mRNA myself or recommended it for China. I only clarified its relative efficacy and some misunderstandings about domestic mRNA trials.
And what does you post proved Winston? Are you for real dude? How about the number of people who have actually died even after taking your super duper vaccines? (Pfizer, MODERNA, Johnson and Johnson etc.) not to mention the actual VACCINE Injury these vaccines have caused, as the case with the doctor on that YouTube video I linked.
If what you're suggesting that using Chinese vaccine is akin to having no protection from Covid-19 then due to the fact that some doctors died, then you're just peddling comedy. In terms of the Chinese vaccine, in this case, SinoVac being linked to Bells palsy, has there been an actual large scale study beyond what was done in Hong Kong, China to support your claim conclusively. Reading through the link you posted, any person with a political agenda would be able to literally pick bits and pieces of the lancet study to both support and refute for and against SinoVac vaccine regarding causality to bell's palsy.
Just an example of what's written on the study:
We anticipated that the size of the sample from the current available data would not be sufficient to do a direct comparison of Bell's palsy incidence following vaccination with CoronaVac and BNT162b2; therefore, such an analysis was not done.
And there's this:
The findings of the sex and age subgroup analyses were similar to the main results except that there was no increased risk of Bell's palsy in women receiving CoronaVac compared with the control group (). The results of the post-hoc analyses on diagnosis interval after vaccination and the number of doses received are shown in . There was no increase in the risk of Bell's palsy in people who received both doses of CoronaVac, but the risk following both doses of BNT162b2 was significantly higher than in the control group. The risk was also significantly higher in individuals for whom there was longer than 14 days between either CoronaVac or BNT162b2 vaccination and Bell's palsy diagnosis, compared with the control group (). The results of the sensitivity analysis were consistent with the primary analysis ().
It's not exactly clear cut as the way you paint the vaccine to be. It's clear, from your responses thus far, that you're aim is to nitpick, complain in ideological bad faith regarding China's politics not policies. You're not here to debate with clear ethical intent, you're here to astroturf this topic and infect as with your political virus.
Go get yourself your 3rd,4th,5th Pfizer vaccines for all I care, go ahead if that's how you float your boat. Quit sniping us with politics.
