Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspective?

Vini_Vidi_Vici

Junior Member
Re: Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspect

Yeah... you do know that China have produced few hundred J-10 right, and they all have radars that can detect few hundred KM ahead. As for AESA radar, China also have them and they will be deployed on J-10B and J-20, and just like Zhuk-AE, it has NOT been mass produced yet. But if you says so, please link them, and btw mass production does not mean it has been put into hundreds of fighters jets.

How do you know F35 is almost completely matured? Last time I check over half of the computer code on F-35 still need to be written, and the American themselves said they would need another 6 years and 110 programmers to finish it. Not to mention the ever cost increase and performance compromise, and even when F-35 is done, it will still be inferior than F-22, less payload, less stealthy etc...

Fact is F-35 is far from completely mature, but we don't know anything about J-20's development. So you can't compare them.

Sources for J-10 radars able to see and guide missiles beyond 100KM?

---------- Post added at 04:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 PM ----------

the question is lockheed makes press releases all the time, Chengdu does not do it, even Sukhoi is more open than Chengdu, in reality you do not know the real rechnical aspects of J-20, the F-22 and F-35 are more open programs to the public.


That's what I mean, if you don't know the real progress of J-20, how can you be sure that F-35 is making more progress than J-20? And no, China is NOT OBLIGATED to tell everyone every single detail of the J-20 program.

But from what we do know, is that F-35 producer themselves said they are facing many problems in development, and it would need them at least another 6 years to get ready. And during this time, if from past experience, it will get even more expensive and it may take even longer.

Because remember, F-35 was suppose to be 1/3 the cost of F-22 when it was first proposed around 70 million dollar each, now the current price has rise to almost 200 million dollar each, even more than the cost of F-22 when they shut down it is production line. You cannot say J-20's development is going to be better or worse than that, all we know is F-35 won't be ready until at least 2018.

X-35 flew in 2000 and F35 in 2006. J-20 started in 2011. Although there are too many demands for customization for each airforce. But just using common sense, let's just say the core F35 designed for USAF, do you think the one flew in 2000 will enter service earlier or the one flew in 2011?
 

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
Re: Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspect

Oh wow.... AGAIN, you are trying to say that China is not as open as US or Russia as if... it is a bad... again, China is NOT OBLIGATED to tell the world the process of J-20, it is in their right to keep as many secret or be as open as they want, they are breaking no law doing so either way.

You just said F-35 is open, but if you would just take 5 minutes ot goggle it, you can see your claim is 100% false, F-35 is not in production, it is not finished, it is not nearly combat ready, the American themselves said, best case it will be ready in 6 years. And judging by their past record on the plane development, it will be even more expensive and take even longer to develop.

And again, with all this information, how can you even claim that F-35 will be sure to get ready before J-20?

I feel like a broken record here... here is what we know

1. F-35 will be ready in 2018 or more
2. We don't know when will J-20 be ready.
3. It is IMPOSSIBLE to say whatever F-35 or J-20 will be operational first.

all what you say is forumlore, nothing realistic or based upon facts.


F-35 has almos 12 years of design since its first flight, J-20 has just being released, a year ago, F-35 already is entering mass production like PAKFA a few dozens will be manufacture

[video=youtube;u0MgS5gG84Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0MgS5gG84Y&list=UUJWcF0ex7_doPdIQGbVpDsQ&index=3&feature=plcp[/video]


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lockheed Martin Corp has won $237 million in extra funding for a fourth batch of F-35 Joint Strike Fighters to account for changes to the hardware and software of the stealthy, supersonic new warplanes, the Pentagon said on Monday.



Read more:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


NYSE:LMT) has received a $490 million contract from the US Department of Defence (DoD) to buy materials and components for the seventh batch of 35 F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) planes. [1] The seventh batch will deliver 19 conventional take-off and landing or F-35 “A” models to the U.S. Air Force, 6 short take-off and vertical landing or F-35 “B” models to the U.S. Marine Corps, 4 carrier variants of F-35 to the U.S. Navy, and remaining 6 F-35 fighter planes to some of the international partners of the F-35 JSF program, including 3 F-35 “A” models to Italy, 2 F-35 “A” models to Turkey and 1 F-35 “B” model to Britain.

The company has also received an order for 2 F-35s from Norway last week. Norway plans to order 50 more F-35s for an estimated cost of $10 billion and will receive its first 4 F-35s by 2016 and the rest post 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
[video=youtube;OOL4XccGpNo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOL4XccGpNo&list=UUJWcF0ex7_doPdIQGbVpDsQ&index=8&feature=plcp[/video]
 
Last edited:

stardave

Junior Member
Re: Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspect

Sources for J-10 radars able to see and guide missiles beyond 100KM?

---------- Post added at 04:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 PM ----------




That's what I mean, if you don't know the real progress of J-20, how can you be sure that F-35 is making more progress than J-20? And no, China is NOT OBLIGATED to tell everyone every single detail of the J-20 program.

But from what we do know, is that F-35 producer themselves said they are facing many problems in development, and it would need them at least another 6 years to get ready. And during this time, if from past experience, it will get even more expensive and it may take even longer.

Because remember, F-35 was suppose to be 1/3 the cost of F-22 when it was first proposed around 70 million dollar each, now the current price has rise to almost 200 million dollar each, even more than the cost of F-22 when they shut down it is production line. You cannot say J-20's development is going to be better or worse than that, all we know is F-35 won't be ready until at least 2018.

X-35 flew in 2000 and F35 in 2006. J-20 started in 2011. Although there are too many demands for customization for each airforce. But just using common sense, let's just say the core F35 designed for USAF, do you think the one flew in 2000 will enter service earlier or the one flew in 2011?[/QUOTE]


F-22 first flight in 1990, F-22 introduction to Air force in 2005
2005-1990=15 years

J-10 first flight in 1998, J-10 introduction to Air force in 2005
2005-1998=7 years

Just saying....

OH AND F-35 first flight was in 2006, NOT 2000.

F-35 first flight 2006+15 years(F-22 development) = 2021.. lets make it 2018 for the sake of your argument
J-20 First flight 2011+7 years (J-10 development) = 2018

So yeah, you can't say for sure which one will be operational first.


The 100km you are using, I think you mean for the plane to be able to fire BVR missile like R-77 or AIM-120 right? If so go google PL-12, it has the same range of R-77 and AIM-120. And all J-10 and Flankers is able to use that.

China have about 100+ Flankers that can use it,
China have about 200+ J-20 that can use it. It uses KLJ-10 radar, which was actually developed base on Phazotron N010, but 100% made in China.

The only missile A2A missile that actually have 100Km range is the Russian R-33 (Only used on Mig-31) and American AIM-54 Phoenix (Retired now, and only used on F-14). The target for both missile is primarily enemy AWAC planes, for fighter jets, medium A2A is enough, aka R-77 and AIM-120 and PL-12

---------- Post added at 06:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:46 PM ----------

all what you say is forumlore, nothing realistic or based upon facts.


F-35 has almos 12 years of design since its first flight, J-20 has just being released, a year ago, F-35 already is entering mass production like PAKFA a few dozens will be manufacture

[video=youtube;u0MgS5gG84Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0MgS5gG84Y&list=UUJWcF0ex7_doPdIQGbVpDsQ&index=3&feature=plcp[/video]


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lockheed Martin Corp has won $237 million in extra funding for a fourth batch of F-35 Joint Strike Fighters to account for changes to the hardware and software of the stealthy, supersonic new warplanes, the Pentagon said on Monday.



Read more:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

That sources does NOT support your claim that F-35 is in production, it only says US have assigned this or that company to produce the plane, read it again, where in it did it say, when will the production start? Where will it be deployed to?


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



They intend to keep F-35 production at very low and costly production rates until at or near full specification performance is demonstrated. For the F-35, final testing is not scheduled for completion until 2017.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Hundreds of F-35s will be built before 2019, when initial testing is complete.


What happening is, they are actually building F-35 even if it is not even fully operationally, US is just pumping out jets that are not even finish testing and use it to let pilots to test it. And when it is finally done, all those jets will go back to the assemble plant and retro fit to became the complete version.

But those incomplete jet will only be in United States, it will not go to Japan, Germany before 2019. And no, it will not be combat ready.


More quote


The F-35 isn't only expensive -- it's way behind schedule. The first plan was to have an initial batch of F-35s available for combat in 2010. Then first deployment was to be 2012. More recently, the military services have said the deployment date is "to be determined." A new target date of 2019 has been informally suggested in testimony -- almost 10 years late.
 
Last edited:

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
Re: Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspect

F-22 first flight in 1990, F-22 introduction to Air force in 2005
2005-1990=15 years

J-10 first flight in 1998, J-10 introduction to Air force in 2005
2005-1998=7 years

But those incomplete jet will only be in United States, it will not go to Japan, Germany before 2019. And no, it will not be combat ready.

So tell me how many F-35 the US has now flying?

How many J-20s flying, how many T-50s flying?


Tell me how many J-20s have TVC nozzles?

Have many J-20 can do V/STOL?






The program continues to be dogged by concurrency, which means developing structure, hardware and complicated software while testing at the same time the first production models from Lockheed-Martin.

For the third time in three years the Pentagon slowed down production rates scheduled through 2017. As a result only 365 will be procured by 2017, rather than the 1,591 that were planned in 2002
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

[video=youtube;dETxLpoC4W8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dETxLpoC4W8&feature=related[/video]
[video=youtube;DJtXv9gUoZw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJtXv9gUoZw[/video]
 
Last edited:

stardave

Junior Member
Re: Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspect

So tell me how many F-35 the US has now flying?

How many J-20s flying, how many T-50s flying?


Tell me how many J-20s have TVC nozzles?

Have many J-20 can do V/STOL?






The program continues to be dogged by concurrency, which means developing structure, hardware and complicated software while testing at the same time the first production models from Lockheed-Martin.

For the third time in three years the Pentagon slowed down production rates scheduled through 2017. As a result only 365 will be procured by 2017, rather than the 1,591 that were planned in 2002
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Again, stupid questions, I show you the source that F-35 will only be ready in 2019, then you cannot counter that, so you ask me the compare the plane's progress and features that J-20 does not have or not even plan to have such as VSTOL. It is not impossible to say that from China's aviation progress, that J-20 won't be ready before 2019.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The F-35 isn't only expensive -- it's way behind schedule. The first plan was to have an initial batch of F-35s available for combat in 2010. Then first deployment was to be 2012. More recently, the military services have said the deployment date is "to be determined." A new target date of 2019 has been informally suggested in testimony -- almost 10 years late.

can't you read? Those 365 planes will only stay within US and they will not even be fully combat ready, it will be mainly for training purposes. That is not the same as IOC.

And why are you keep linking youtube videos that does not support your argument whatsoever?
 

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
Re: Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspect

can't you read? Those 365 planes will only stay within US and they will not even be fully combat ready, it will be mainly for training purposes. That is not the same as IOC.

The company has also received an order for 2 F-35s from Norway last week. Norway plans to order 50 more F-35s for an estimated cost of $10 billion and will receive its first 4 F-35s by 2016 and the


of course you do not condidered that
 

stardave

Junior Member
Re: Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspect

The company has also received an order for 2 F-35s from Norway last week. Norway plans to order 50 more F-35s for an estimated cost of $10 billion and will receive its first 4 F-35s by 2016 and the


of course you do not condidered that


Yeah sure great idea, plane will only finish test flight in 2019, but people will receive them just for training in 2016. So it is not combat ready, what's the point?

You should know the original plan is to finish test flight in 2010 and full scale introduction in 2012, that has been push back all the way to 2019, and the price have sky rocked to 300%

So what are the chances that from now to 2019, there will be even more delay and even more price increase?

Also like to add this.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Deputy Chief of Air Staff of the Chinese Air Force (or PLA-AF), General He Weirong, had declared in 2009 that the J-20 would obtain its Initial Operational Service (IOC) between 2017 and 2019.

So yes, you can't tell me for sure that F-35 will go into IOC before J-20.
 
Last edited:

Lion

Senior Member
Re: Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspect

Phazotron Zhuk-AE already mass produced them. I was referring to long distance radars on Russian Su-27 and Su-30s. They can see few hundred kilometers ahead. Those include N001VE or Phazotron N010 Zhuk-27 or an N011M BARS.

That is Bull.. Phazotron Zhukov-AE is for mig-35. How many mig-35 is in service? As for BARS, it's passive and not AESA. Don't talk rot.

That's a close call. We never know which one gets fielded first. J-20 is still in very early test flight stages, usually taking many many years for something this sophisticated to enter service. On the other hand, F35 is almost completely matured. But the production problems, especially the supply priority for all the countries will make Japan wait for many years before they can fly one. We don't know which one gets it first.

J-10B will be deployed soon. Very likely, it will equipped with AESA for it.
 

Mysterre

Banned Idiot
Re: Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspect

just let me say, i believe the true experts, Lockheed built the F-22, F-117, SR-71, U-2 so they know about stealth, technologies change, and i believe Sukhoi too, they built S-37 Berkut with S ducts and internal weapons bays.

I will believe all the nations buying F-35s, because they also have experts and i believe F-117 was retired by experts too, so for me a rounded engine nacelle is not inferior just because airpower australia claims it, specially when the tailbooms are aligned with the inlets and it is just rounded where it will not be a big RCS signature increase from the angular sector the fighter will use to approach the radar; besides Sukhoi and Saturn are making the T-50 and Su-35 based upon realistic concepts and same is lockheed by increasing the range of passive detectors like IRST they can fly at longer ranges from their targets and in the case of T-50 by having better supercruise performance faster than their enemy that is also stealth.


So yes i believe the true experts, the one that design the jets Sukhoi and Lockheed, not airpower australia
NONE of what you just said addresses the horrible undercarriage of the T-50 and F-35 except to say that you trust the "experts". Which ones say that the undercarriarge in either of those planes is a marvel of stealth design? Please don't tell me that because stealth is no longer important, it doesn't matter anymore, like you did before. That is a massive copout answer, and it's a rather hilarious one in light of the fact that we are talking about a stealth fighter. And by the way, the nations talking about buying the F-35 are almost all of them talking about walking away from the project at this point. Unfortunately, the F-35 is a practical failure that is now too big to fail officially. So you go on trusting those "experts" from who knows where because you have no real answer to give me.
 

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
Re: Consequences of Flanker and PAK FA exports for the PACRIM from US-allied perspect

NONE of what you just said addresses the horrible undercarriage of the T-50 and F-35 except to say that you trust the "experts". Which ones say that the undercarriarge in either of those planes is a marvel of stealth design? Please don't tell me that because stealth is no longer important, it doesn't matter anymore, like you did before. That is a massive copout answer, and it's a rather hilarious one in light of the fact that we are talking about a stealth fighter. And by the way, the nations talking about buying the F-35 are almost all of them talking about walking away from the project at this point. Unfortunately, the F-35 is a practical failure that is now too big to fail officially. So you go on trusting those "experts" from who knows where because you have no real answer to give me.

Lockheed Martin won`t change the F-35 design only because you read air power australia or Karlo copp, niether Sukhoi will be scared to read Karlo Kopp.


You simple you do not understand why they have rounded fuselages when it is obvious they can build flatened fuselages, and the answer is simply they have different contradictions to solve and different ways to solve them, plus they know the limits of stealth.

In the case of Sukhoi the designed a fighter with high performance with higher top speed and supercruise speed than F-22 according to Sukhoi.

it simply means that at long ranges is pretty stealthy but flies faster with longer range missiles and IRST the jet stays out the the range of the enemy, plus the rounded fuselage allows for lower drag in both T-50 and F-35 and the tail booms are aligned with the intake so the RCS signature laterally is very low

So regardless what you say, you do not form part of Sukhoi or Lockheed Martin or do you? unless you are, Lockheed Martin or Sukhoi won`t care about youir opinion since they know facts about stealth you do not know and they have chosen that configuration to optimize their jets without caring for stealth.
 
Top