COMAC C919

KevinG

New Member
Registered Member
If you believe "handling at least once is enough as training" then there is nothing specific needed for training, isn't? It's like opening your new car's fuel tank hatch for the first time, you just need to read the manul for once in 1 minute. An average intellegent person can open the aircraft emergence hatch by reading the printed texts on it without any training, let alone a skilled baggage handler. Many incidents of smartass passenger opened emergence hatch are good evidence of "no training needed". This also includes refueling the aircraft. Pulling and pushing the aircraft is like experienced driver maneuvering a lorry of similar size from different brands without any prior training, the hooking up is standardized already.
So you do agree me with me that a lot of staff need specific training to operate a new type of aircraft. In order to operate C919 widely across China, a lot more staff need to be trained, which takes time and money. Before these personnel and facility for C919 are widely available across China, C919 probably can't reach the save average sortie rate as B737 and A320, even the airplane itself is mature enough.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
So you do agree me with me that a lot of staff need specific training to operate a new type of aircraft. In order to operate C919 widely across China, a lot more staff need to be trained, which takes time and money. Before these personnel and facility for C919 are widely available across China, C919 probably can't reach the save average sortie rate as B737 and A320, even the airplane itself is mature enough.
No, on the contrary, I am saying that the "specific training" you mentioned isn't training at all. See my words
If you believe "handling at least once is enough as training" then there is nothing specific needed for training, isn't?...... This also includes ...... (other handling tasks).
 
Last edited:

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
But the problem for C919 pilots is not stay current, they need to get the license first.
You are misstaking "type rating (737 pilot to switch to 320)" with "pilot certification (licensing)". See answer from commercial airline pilot. The pilot seems implying that even the licensing need only one flight with the real aircraft. So for type rating you need only one flight.

So you can calculate how many flights (takeoff and landing) have all C919s conducted so far and how many current 737/320 pilots could have been type rated for C919. I think number of pilots isn't a limiting factor.

1720220382897.png

1720220476259.png
 
Last edited:

by78

General
The first batch of eight China Southern pilots have completed their conversion training for the C919.

53855315709_442a12a646_o.jpg
 
Top