China Should look into the PD-14 as a stopgap till the CJ-1000A is complete.They are gonna choke off the engine supply long before C-919 reaches triple digits.
China Should look into the PD-14 as a stopgap till the CJ-1000A is complete.They are gonna choke off the engine supply long before C-919 reaches triple digits.
this has to be a joke.. rightChina Should look into the PD-14 as a stopgap till the CJ-1000A is complete.
Yes but if the US decides to cut the LEAP off before the demand could be met by the CJ-1000 production output alone, the Russians would be a good alternative until mass production of the CJ-1000A has been achieved.this has to be a joke.. right
CJ-1000 airborne testing has begun. its already been 10 months. engine is just 2/3 years away from small scale production. you will see CJ-1000 mounted on C919 wings after 2025..
So to solve a potential future supply chain issue, you think they should lash the C919 to an unproven unreliable supply chain?China Should look into the PD-14 as a stopgap till the CJ-1000A is complete.
This isn’t the early Cold War. The world has come a long way from the flying coffins of the Tu104.A decade? Hardly. The Y-20 has basically all those components in it.
Well, this is wrong. Engines are some of the very few directly imported parts on that aircraft. They are also by far the most complicated part. Most other stuff are produced by joint ventures in China and their equivalents (even if they are not entirely suitable for civilian aviation) exist in the military world.So to solve a potential future supply chain issue, you think they should lash the C919 to an unproven unreliable supply chain?
C919 is today highly westernized with the engines just being the most obvious and if you haven’t heard Russia is persona non grata with regard’s to the west. If you put Russian engines under C919 you basically create the very problem you are arguing to solve as the engines are solved but the other systems are terminated. You might as well push to buy MC21s