The problem is that @horobeyo doesnt really offer much analysis to counter Sutton's suggestions. As I noted before, we have multiple in service or in evaluation designs worldwide abiding by the same design principles for UUV applications. None of which are for high speed or weapons applications or both. While I disagree with Sutton's assessments quite regularly on particular topics, I also wouldn't dismiss his knowledge on UUV etc development.
As I've mentioned before, right now we've got more questions than answers. I just dont think dismissing certain IMO sound suggestions on use can be considered wishcasting. Generally speaking more ambitious claims tend to be proven untrue over more moderate operational parameters, more often than not. In any case its wait and see.
