JerryoPt wrote: Oct 7th 2011 6:29 GMT The column came close to asking a very interesting question when mentioning a UAS pilot in Nevada going home for dinner with his family. If that 'pilot' is a legal combatant, even when off duty having dinner with his family in suburban Washington or Las Vegas with his family, is he still a legitimate 'target' and would his family be considered acceptable 'collateral damage'?
If the target were an AQ leader, off duty, having dinner with his family would his family be considered 'collateral damage'?