Now that I think about this again, I hope I'm overreacting. These robots, while improving, may never be a sufficient alternative to real women. The stimulation of sex is multi-faceted; much of it is mental. If it were just the physical sensation, then much less than these robots, perhaps only some silicone asses with pulse and heat functions would suffice. But a large part of sexual pleasure resides in seeing your partner's reactions, seeing how you please them, and knowing that it is real and it is a joint experience. The reactions of a machine are nothing but programming that is already there, waiting for you, created to cheat you to feeling a certain way, as if you've accomplished pleasing your partner when all you've actually done is submit yourself to being manipulated by a computer program. The knowledge of this should mean that no matter how realistic a sex bot is, it cannot substitute a real woman.
This can confine the role of sex robots to prevent thier spread and damage to the whole of society, limiting them to incels and losers who would never have been able to find a real partner anyway. Only these people can pretend, in a sour grapes fashion, that this is all they need, to fool themselves into thinking that they have finally escaped the torment of rejection when all they've really done is give up on the ladder of self-improvement. As for the rest of humanity, sex bots should carry a stigma. They are only for those types of people who wish to eat steak, but cannot afford it, so they chew soggy carboard dipped in artificial beef broth.
