interesting, so both YMTC and CXMT are looking to IPO next year at about the same valuation.
Yangtze Memory Technologies Co. is considering an initial public offering in mainland China at a valuation that could exceed $40 billion, according to people familiar with the matter, in what could be one of the biggest listings there in years.
YMTC, as the chipmaker is known, may seek a valuation of 200 billion yuan ($28 billion) to 300 billion yuan, and it’s working with China International Capital Corp. and CSC Financial Co. on the potential IPO, the people said, asking not to be identified as the information is private. An offering may take place as soon as next year, some of the people said.
Separately, ChangXin Memory Technologies Inc. is also planning to go public onshore. The company, known as CXMT, this month completed pre-listing tutoring work for its IPO and is working with CICC and CSC Financial, the same pair of banks YMTC is relying on. The Hefei-based chip firm is also targeting a valuation of 200 billion yuan to 300 billion yuan in its IPO, people familiar with the matter said, confirming an earlier Reuters report.
Do you have to publish this data to be quoted at the Shanghai stock exchange? It would be necessary in Hong Kong yes.At least this will finally let us know for sure how much capacity and production they are doing.
I don't know but SMIC and HH will both talk about their capacity on their earning calls, so I would assume YMTC and CXMT will at least share some stuff.Do you have to publish this data to be quoted at the Shanghai stock exchange? It would be necessary in Hong Kong yes.
Chinese regulators are asking the country’s leading chipmakers to list domestically in order to gain more control over the types of investors that can buy shares in the strategically important companies, as part of Beijing's efforts to ramp up its semiconductor industry amid a chip war with the US.
“The regulators have concerns over a Hong Kong IPO as it’s hard to tell who the actual backers of the international investors are. They especially don’t want a significant portion of the shares falling into the hands of US investors given the chip war between China and the US,” said one of the people.
“The regulators can have more control over the type of investors for an A-share IPO given foreign investors participate in A-share IPOs primarily through the QFII [Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor] programme, which is heavily regulated,” said another person.
“We expect more big chipmakers to list in the A-share market as the regulators are very supportive of the listings of important technology companies. The listing process for them will be very fast compared with companies from other sectors,” said a Beijing-based ECM banker.
Article 5
If a listed company or disclosure obligor has sufficient evidence that the information to be disclosed involves state secrets or other matters whose disclosure would violate state confidentiality laws or management requirements (collectively referred to as “state secrets”), they may lawfully be exempted from disclosure.
Article 6
Listed companies and disclosure obligors have a duty to protect state secrets. They shall not, through any means—such as information disclosure, investor Q&A, press releases, or interviews—leak state secrets or use the excuse of “classified information” for promotional purposes.
The chairman and board secretary must enhance awareness of laws on confidentiality and ensure that disclosed information does not violate state secrecy provisions.
Article 7
If the information to be disclosed involves trade secrets or confidential business information (collectively referred to as “trade secrets”), and meets any of the following conditions, and has not been made public or leaked, it may be deferred or exempted from disclosure:
Article 8
- It involves core technical information, and disclosure could lead to unfair competition;
- It involves the company’s own operational information, or that of clients, suppliers, or others, and disclosure could infringe upon trade secrets or cause serious harm to the company or others;
- Other circumstances where disclosure could seriously harm the interests of the company or others.
After a company defers or is exempted from disclosing trade secrets, it must promptly disclose the information when:
Article 9
- The reasons for deferral or exemption no longer exist;
- The information can no longer be kept confidential;
- The information has been leaked or rumors have appeared in the market.
If a listed company’s periodic reports involve state or trade secrets, it may use pseudonyms, summary descriptions, or omit key details to exempt disclosure.
If temporary reports involve such secrets, similar methods may be used; if disclosure still poses a leakage risk, the temporary report may be exempted entirely.