Doing nothing would have been a reasonable alternative had they not boxed themselves into a corner by demonizing China to the public and hyping up an issue that could have been ignored. Government controls media and media influences people and those people put pressure on the government by voting. So, right from the root, they did it to themselves. If they just shut up and didn't say anything to anyone about China, that would have been better. If they were intelligent enough to paint a semi-positive image of China to the American people so they can lay a deeper trap for China increasing our reliance and improving America's image in China by softening their stances on Taiwan and the SCS, that would have lulled China into a very dangerous situation, should they do a sudden 180 and impose all sanctions at once in a conflict we didn't think they would care to escalate. But that's talking about a 4D chess move being played by a kid with Down Syndrome so... we're here instead.I said that it's possible to argue that export controls are working better than any reasonable alternative. You said doing nothing would be better, which I agree with, but I would also not call that a "reasonable alternative." For the exact same reason that you described, there was huge political pressure on them to do something, anything, even if it ended up being counterproductive.
Just because you’re an “insider” doesn’t mean you have a good read on the whole picture of an industry.While I again agree about the outcome now, nobody could see the future when this started. I'm sure you remember many insiders were very concerned back in 2022. It was not guaranteed that reality would turn out the way it did, and arguing the case that the US had a reasonable expectation of a more favorable outcome at the time would be difficult, but not impossible. Counterfactuals cannot be proven or disproven by definition.
Feels like a pretty big developmentThat is the range for Single Patterning, Double Patterning and Self Aligned Quadruple Patterning Immersion Lithography
This i agree. Not just on chip Sanctions but on most othet sectors. It seems the Chinese government is wary of taking drastic measures to affect US/Western companies in a tit for tat move. I believe there must be a reason Xi jinping has been more passive and lenient in this regard. Afterall, they know more about the country and state of affairs than we common people do. So we should trust his/their judgement.Chinese government has honestly been way too lenient on these chip sanctions. Still refusing to even invalidate patents by AMAT and Lam in China.
“Enforcement’s important,” he said in an interview on the plane before his meetings in Beijing. “But for me it is not as defining of the future of the technology landscape as the set of consequential actions that we have taken, and will continue to take.”
“Stockpiling is a challenge but there’s a clock on it,” Sullivan said in the interview. “And not only because of servicing and components, but because of degradation of the capability of return. So it is absolutely not too late for us to up our game collectively on semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and that’s what we’re driving to do.”
The Dutch government will take the economic interests of ASML (ASML.AS), into account when deciding on further tightening the rules governing the export of ASML computer chip making equipment to China, Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof said on Friday.
"We are in talks, good talks and we are also watching out very specifically for the economic interests of ASML, those need to be weighed against other risks and the economic interests are extremely important," Schoof said, in response to questions about possible further restrictions on ASML exports to China.
"ASML is for the Netherlands an extremely important, innovative industry that should not suffer under any circumstances, because that would damage ASML's global position," he added.
Schoof would not comment on reports from Bloomberg News on Thursday that the Netherlands would put more curbs on ASML's China chip business.
The way I read it is that the mass production of SSA800A had an effect, why? if we believed the rumored that it's performance is comparable to NXT 2000i then its game over. The 7nm domestic line will be ready in 2025 and I think the Beijing FAB is been primed to mass produced it. That SMIC Beijing FAB is huge with a potential capacity to produce 150,000 WPM, while the new Shanghai FAB will be using the recent purchase ASML DUVI making use of the supply chain and maintenance support already established there.Netherlands to weigh ASML's interests in China export restriction decision, PM says