Yet for US officials, who asked not to be identified discussing sensitive diplomatic relations, any Chinese moves would amount to little more than a propaganda exercise. They described the technical aspects of Huawei’s phone as mediocre compared with all the fanfare, and said the US efforts to maintain a technological edge on China are working — no matter what Beijing says.
While Raimondo has said she needs more tools to ensure her agency can better punish those who violate US export controls, Sullivan — President Joe Biden’s national security advisor and the architect of US tech curbs — said the overall impact of the American efforts shows the policy is successful, even if loopholes still exist.
“Enforcement’s important,” he said in an interview on the plane before his meetings in Beijing. “But for me it is not as defining of the future of the technology landscape as the set of consequential actions that we have taken, and will continue to take.”
“Stockpiling is a challenge but there’s a clock on it,” Sullivan said in the interview. “And not only because of servicing and components, but because of degradation of the capability of return. So it is absolutely not too late for us to up our game collectively on semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and that’s what we’re driving to do.”
Chinese officials complain about the US actions as much as they insist the measures aren’t working. American officials see that as a sign of anxiety — and proof that their policy is having the intended effect.
The Huawei phone unveiled last August is an example of that, the US officials said. They saw the device, which was widely celebrated in China as a breakthrough for Huawei and SMIC, as underwhelming in technical capabilities and more of a propaganda tool to fight back against US curbs.