That makes sense, it's about what I thought.
Thanks
Just wanted to confirm it wasn't that we were somehow expecting them to produce flagship level smartphones with 14nm stacked lol.
Chinese semiconductor industry
- Thread starter Hendrik_2000
- Start date
- Status
That makes sense, it's about what I thought.
Thanks
Just wanted to confirm it wasn't that we were somehow expecting them to produce flagship level smartphones with 14nm stacked lol.
I think 7nm stacked might be good enough for mobile, the thing is how much computing power can you get per watt consumed. This is important for personal devices like phones and laptops. One thing vertical integration from silicon to software might actually make the end user experience more pleasant if Huawei can optimize their software. Google has been able to do this with their Pixel phones for years now very sub optimal hardware with excellent software development.
In the server market is also interesting AWS services that provide a graviton option are usually cheaper per wattage consumed. Aws graviton is Amazon's own custom ARM chip design for some of their cloud services.
Not a expert, but a single layer chip has limited area where you can draw on. Stacking multiple 14nm you can double maybe even triple that area. So a 3d stacked 14nm can provide enough area for computing power to approach that of 5~7nm computing power on a single layer.
example:
single layer area 1cm^2 can provide a transistor count(5nm) of 10 billion
3d stacked layer area 2 times 1 cm^2 so effectively 2cm^2 because you can stack 2 layers which can provide a transistor count(14nm) of 9 billion.
The negative side of this is you need to power and cool the bigger chip.
So you probably need to spend more on cooling and battery.
As far as is know is an advanced packaging technique which allows to interconnect multiple dies in a single chip 3Dimensional or a monolithic technique to build the chip in 3d layer by layer (by example a memory stack) or a combination of both, in other words more transistors in a single chip, better performance.
US blocks companies aiding Chinese military's quantum computing efforts
The US is taking extra steps to prevent China's military from claiming . The Commerce Department has added eight technology producers to its Entity List to prevent them from supporting the Chinese military's quantum computing efforts. Officials are concerned the entities could feed "emerging" US tech that could aid with , producing and developing anti-stealth or anti-submarine systems.focuses on a mix of companies and researchers, including QuantumCTek and the Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale. The US also added three affiliates of Corad Technology Limited, a Chinese firm on the list since 2019, although it wasn't clear that quantum computing was involved — it was also accused of backing Iran's military and space programs as well as North Korea "front companies."
The broader Entity List update included 27 organizations and people, including 13 in Pakistan accused of backing the country's "unsafeguarded" nuclear or ballistic missile programs.
This is unlikely to put a stop to China's military uses of quantum computing when the country may need to research and develop much of the technology in-house. The expanded blocklist might slow things down, however, by limiting China's access to American processors and other equipment that could fast-track development. Consider this a stumbling block that gives the US a better chance of .
CNBC article about ASML. It mentions ASML launching a High-NA machine in 2025 and that intel got an exclusive deal to buy the first machines.
What do you think of it? I think that this exclusive deal will give intel an edge compared to TSMC and samsung. I also wonder why did ASML made this deal, unless intel is paying very big.
I dont know if this has already been posted. This article from semiengineering talks about High-NA.
Too technical for me. Does anyone knows if china has anything in this area?
What do you think of it? I think that this exclusive deal will give intel an edge compared to TSMC and samsung. I also wonder why did ASML made this deal, unless intel is paying very big.
I dont know if this has already been posted. This article from semiengineering talks about High-NA.
Too technical for me. Does anyone knows if china has anything in this area?
...and the US elite just killed it's own quantum computing industry. LOL they never learn.
Just 1 company of the list make Quantum products, like i said before U.S. products are unreliable and U.S. companies are unreliable partners. Chinese companies put themselves and their investors at risk by buying U.S. products. This is with Biden, with Trump in 2025 is going to be much much worse. The de-Americanization of commercial products is the only way forward for Chinese companies.US blocks companies aiding Chinese military's quantum computing efforts
The US is taking extra steps to prevent China's military from claiming . The Commerce Department has added eight technology producers to its Entity List to prevent them from supporting the Chinese military's quantum computing efforts. Officials are concerned the entities could feed "emerging" US tech that could aid with , producing and developing anti-stealth or anti-submarine systems.
focuses on a mix of companies and researchers, including QuantumCTek and the Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale. The US also added three affiliates of Corad Technology Limited, a Chinese firm on the list since 2019, although it wasn't clear that quantum computing was involved — it was also accused of backing Iran's military and space programs as well as North Korea "front companies."
The broader Entity List update included 27 organizations and people, including 13 in Pakistan accused of backing the country's "unsafeguarded" nuclear or ballistic missile programs.
This is unlikely to put a stop to China's military uses of quantum computing when the country may need to research and develop much of the technology in-house. The expanded blocklist might slow things down, however, by limiting China's access to American processors and other equipment that could fast-track development. Consider this a stumbling block that gives the US a better chance of .
Chinese companies should invest within China in companies that offer alternative products.
- Status