Which is not a whitelist ie membership does not guarantee access.Russia is part of the Wassenaar Agreement
Which is not a whitelist ie membership does not guarantee access.Russia is part of the Wassenaar Agreement
He does not speculate or making outrageous claim. He just stated Huawei take a position at start up laser company who work on excimer type of laser source Why is that fanboy ?The posts might have been written by fanboys but what I know is that whaever field Huawei sets its sight on ,it completely pulverizes the competition .
The Americans could not have picked a wrong Chinese firm to try and kill than Huawei .
Not semiconductor. Debunked again.IBM creates largest ever superconducting quantum computer
IBM claims it has created the world’s largest superconducting quantum computer, surpassing the size of state-of-the-art machines from Google and from researchers at a Chinese university. Previous devices have demonstrated up to 60 superconducting qubits, or quantum bits, working together to solve problems, but IBM’s new Eagle processor more than doubles that by stringing together 127.
IBM’s 127-qubit Eagle processor now takes the top spot as the largest, and therefore theoretically most powerful, superconducting quantum computer to be demonstrated. Each additional qubit represents a significant step forward in ability: unlike classical computers, which rise in power in a linear fashion as they grow, one additional qubit effectively doubles a quantum processor’s potential power.
IBM has said that it hopes to demonstrate a 400-qubit processor next year and to break the 1000-qubit barrier the following year with a chip called Condor. At that point, it is expected that a limit on expansion will be reached that requires quantum computers to be created from networks of these processors strung together by fibre-optic links.
Thats right. Im not an expert. But to claim that the fact that a single EUVlithography machine costing less and taking less time to built compared to a space station means that its easier to make, also doesnt make you an expert. In fact, its laughable. Otherwise, why hasnt china developed one already, despite producing space stations for many years now? And your materials argument doesnt prove anything.you are not a subject matter expert in either semiconductors OR aerospace engineering.
Difficulty can be approximated by money. . of which
Difficulty can also be approximated by lead time. . A .
It is 10000x more difficult in space due to the solar environment and space debris. EUV is not penetrating but is highly chemically active, resulting in materials degradation. In addition they require other tests such as vibration analysis, high velocity impact testing, radiation hardness, etc that are not relevant for EUV lithography.
I didnt say that china hasnt them. I said that chinese foundries dont have acess to Intel/TSMC suppliers.China has all those ingredients
Sure. But if chinese foundries dont have acess to these suppliers, this will be the key difference.if TSMC and Intel have the same suppliers and Intel started first with a supposedly insurmountable first mover advantage, how did TSMC surpass Intel? clearly the key difference isn't in access to suppliers then.
Because the priority was put in different places at different times. You can counter ask: if space stations were so easy how come Netherlands doesn't have a space station or even a rocket launch capability?Thats right. Im not an expert. But to claim that the fact that a single EUVlithography machine costing less and taking less time to built compared to a space station means that its easier to make, also doesnt make you an expert. In fact, its laughable. Otherwise, why hasnt china developed one already, despite producing space stations for many years now? And your materials argument doesnt prove anything.
I didnt say that china hasnt them. I said that chinese foundries dont have acess to Intel/TSMC suppliers.
Sure. But if chinese foundries dont have acess to these suppliers, this will be the key difference.
Ok. I guess i can accept that argument.Because the priority was put in different places at different times.
Not for me. But perhabs someone in this forum can say if china has all the materials technology to produce an EUVL machine.My materials argument proves everything.
Ok. I guess i can accept that argument.
Not for me. But perhabs someone in this forum can say if china has all the materials technology to produce an EUVL machine.
SCMP article about the latest chinese supercomputers. I think that it shows some of the strengths and limitations of chinese semiconductor tech. What do you think of it?
I remember hearing domestic SMIC/SMEE 14nm by 2021, or did I remember wrongly?