There’s really nothing special about ArF lasers. It’s a very mature technology at this point.The more important question is can China make quality ArF lasers for these machines.
There’s really nothing special about ArF lasers. It’s a very mature technology at this point.The more important question is can China make quality ArF lasers for these machines.
There’s really nothing special about ArF lasers. It’s a very mature technology at this point.
I’m well aware (have to deal with photon spread tolerances sometimes at work). But also, ArF is a mature technology. It’s not hard to do right if you put in the effort. There’s no mystery to the science and engineering.
Quality of laser matters for low tolerance applications.
I’m well aware (have to deal with photon spread tolerances sometimes at work). But also, ArF is a mature technology. It’s not hard to do right if you put in the effort. There’s no mystery to the science and engineering.
Still very much a niche market. Look at how much Huawei makes.Yet the amount of companies that manufacture this kind of equipment is quite small worldwide.
Also, even if you do have an ArF laser, if it was low power it means you need a lot more exposure time for the laser to do its job.
i.e. you get way worse productivity.
You would think with how expensive these lithography machines are (DUV machines can cost 40-50 millions, EUV machines can cost 100 millions USD) that they would have more competition if it is that easy to make one.
That’s not a reflection of a lack of of engineering ability. It’s just that this stuff has high capital costs so the number of players the market can support shrinks pretty rapidly. Costs are not always proxy for difficulty, just resource intensity and complexity. There’s no point devoting your engineering efforts to chase a business opportunity that’s expensive to do when the market already has mature solutions providers. Better to devote that talent to opportunities that have a higher reward to effort ratio. Much more effective, sustainable, and productive use of investment money.Yet the amount of companies that manufacture this kind of equipment is quite small worldwide.
Also, even if you do have an ArF laser, if it was low power it means you need a lot more exposure time for the laser to do its job.
i.e. you get way worse productivity.
You would think with how expensive these lithography machines are (DUV machines can cost 40-50 millions, EUV machines can cost 100 millions USD) that they would have more competition if it is that easy to make one.
Wait, but even the somewhat out of date SMEE website states that the SSA 600/20 uses an ArF laser!
Military side is by no means safe. Its beidou chip is based 28nm and using US equipments for production currently. It didn't proactively go the deamerican tech route. I can understand the regular industry didn't do it before the current tech war but the military side also didn't so it is mind boggling
Chinese thought its own chip design is sufficient to be qualified as self independent. Never in million year they anticipate US goes to extreme to enforce foreign companies using US equipments
Hi OppositeDay,I'm too surprised China hasn't been more prepared. Autonomous drones clearly hold one key to future warfare. Surely PLA wasn't planning on using TSMC-made chips as 'brains' of its autonomous killing machines?