Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
There's always Doubting Thomas articles like this about lithography, and in every single case the barriers are broken. 3nm on time is a certainty, you can bet your house on it. The money is irrelevant, the investments are irrelevant, and the difficulties are irrelevant - this is literally the only advanced industry Taiwan has, no one's lining up to buy aircraft from them. If TSMC loses its edge, they'll all become pineapple farmers.

The advancements will stop like they stopped in clock speeds: when physics says they stop.
Of course barriers always can be broken but the law of diminishing returns also apply, at some point consumers will not want to pay too much for by example CPUs or GPUs that only offer marginal performance with the same silicon of two years ago, then you have to rely in commercial hype gimmicks like RayTracing or lab transistors names like GAAFET or saying 20A instead of 2nm to get people to pay higher prices. Or wating until some weird Cryptocurrency appear so people pay higher prices for hardware expecting some return.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
There's always Doubting Thomas articles like this about lithography, and in every single case the barriers are broken. 3nm on time is a certainty, you can bet your house on it. The money is irrelevant, the investments are irrelevant, and the difficulties are irrelevant - this is literally the only advanced industry Taiwan has, no one's lining up to buy aircraft from them. If TSMC loses its edge, they'll all become pineapple farmers.

The advancements will stop like they stopped in clock speeds: when physics says they stop.
They can try, but they're not in control here. The final customer is.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at 10 nm. let's take a look at the trend chart again.

nano3.png


Going by the cost trend here we predict at the 5 nm node the SoC will surpass the display in cost (83% increase in costs, unit cost likely >$100) to become the most expensive part of the phone. At the 3 nm node the development costs will approach $1 billion USD and the SoC will dominate the price of the phone.

At this point, customers will likely already have everything they want in a 7 nm or 10 nm phone. Are they going to pay literally double (or, alternatively, will a phone OEM halve their profits) for something slightly better on paper that they can't really see the benefits of?
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Yeah brother, new materials are the key for the future of the Chinese IC.

The engineering for the current 5nm then 3nm, is massive.

Too massive. That can only be done with over-engineering the current methods.

I'm not an engineer, but over-engineering is no different than anything else in life.

When we get to that point, we all know, that situation has reached its limits, and time for something new.

TSMC can put all its efforts to over-engineering the 7nm to 5nm then 3nm.

China should put all its efforts to figure out a new way of doing it.

Then SMIC talks to TSMC saying they will not wipe them out if they develop new materials and if they continue selling their stuff, out in the open for through the Ho Chi Min Trail.

:oops:

I agree. You need new paradigms like new architectures, 3D stacking, new materials, etc. Simple die shrinking is going to hit a brick wall.
 

caudaceus

Senior Member
Registered Member
They can try, but they're not in control here. The final customer is.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at 10 nm. let's take a look at the trend chart again.

nano3.png


Going by the cost trend here we predict at the 5 nm node the SoC will surpass the display in cost (83% increase in costs, unit cost likely >$100) to become the most expensive part of the phone. At the 3 nm node the development costs will approach $1 billion USD and the SoC will dominate the price of the phone.

At this point, customers will likely already have everything they want in a 7 nm or 10 nm phone. Are they going to pay literally double (or, alternatively, will a phone OEM halve their profits) for something slightly better on paper that they can't really see the benefits of?
Looking at the chart, the biggest cost hike is the software?
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
They can try, but they're not in control here. The final customer is.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at 10 nm. let's take a look at the trend chart again.

nano3.png


Going by the cost trend here we predict at the 5 nm node the SoC will surpass the display in cost (83% increase in costs, unit cost likely >$100) to become the most expensive part of the phone. At the 3 nm node the development costs will approach $1 billion USD and the SoC will dominate the price of the phone.

At this point, customers will likely already have everything they want in a 7 nm or 10 nm phone. Are they going to pay literally double (or, alternatively, will a phone OEM halve their profits) for something slightly better on paper that they can't really see the benefits of?
The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top