And there’s your issue. Digitimes is very tabloidy.Tom's Hardware is quoting DIGITIMES. Which is an electronics trade publication in Taiwan. They are not concocting things out of thin air.
And there’s your issue. Digitimes is very tabloidy.Tom's Hardware is quoting DIGITIMES. Which is an electronics trade publication in Taiwan. They are not concocting things out of thin air.
It seems hard to change our friends mind here.And there’s your issue. Digitimes is very tabloidy.
That's hard to say. Depends how they implement on their threats. But banning ga effect on defense industry and new energy industry is massive. Again, let's see if they are willing to actually go forth with it fully.Given the severity of the equipment export bans, does anyone else think Ga and Ge export bans are a little too weak in retaliation?
Not really. You can select cymer or gigaphoton. That's just standard choice any customers can make.ASML has already said that they are not making a special version of DUVi for China. The context of that statement was related to capping the ability of the machines to 28nm. However, ASML is also aware that US is soon going to apply the US-origin-components rule to the DUVI machines that have not been banned by Dutch government. So if they swap out US origin parts because of that and make a DUVi, wouldn't that count as making a special machine for china. I think if US is going to apply that rule they will make their intentions very clear to ASML and they would have other ways of threatening ASML not to evade US sanctions.
if ASML refuses, then it must realize that its IP may no longer be enforceable, and the non-enforceability of its IP may not be limited to replacement of wear parts on their instruments.Many capital equipment/machinery servicing cycles involves non OEM participants, so there is nothing stopping ASML from accrediting third party's to conduct servicing on its behalf if all the key equipment parameters and conditions are provided to ensure everything is up to spec. Not a perfect analogy but an independent mechanic is perfectly capable of servicing a BMW as well as that from an authorized dealership, using OEM or non-OEM parts. Granted, that exists because of consumer protection laws forcing the OEM's to open up the servicing but the precedent exists.
I think the other piece that people need to understand is that in a large project integrating precision accuracy, moving parts, electromechanical systems it takes alot longer to debug and validate designs, hypotheses, evaluate performance, etc. It takes significant time to run the operational sequence using the prototypes, components etc. t o evaluate how well its working and how to tweak it. It takes a fair bit of time to gather the data, analyze the feedback and make adjustments. So it may look like they are moving at a glacial pace and not with the urgency required, but they can only move as fast as the slowest piece of the project at this point, which is gathering the data on evaluation and putting it through the feedback loop. It's not a software development project where you can brute force progress by weighting more inputs. But it looks like the sub-system component providers in the supply chain are ramped up ready to go, so once the green light is given alot of the whiplash here should fade.
At this point, you have already put in motion desires in western countries to source alternative to Chinese suppliers.
i am not sure if that is a good idea. US and western countries can then ignore the rare earth processing patents.if ASML refuses, then it must realize that its IP may no longer be enforceable, and the non-enforceability of its IP may not be limited to replacement of wear parts on their instruments.
Until ASML is compelled to completely stop doing ABSOLUTELY ANY business with China. That will very likely soon happen, regardless of the consequences. The Americans political elites don't care about any of China's retaliatory capabilities on trade of anything - gallium, germanium, rare earths, etc - and the Europeans, Japanese, and other allies will either meekly or enthusiastically abide by them... SMEE and other Chinese IC chips and semiconductor related equipment manufacturers better hurry the entire indigenous development of all products related to high DUVi machines...I wouldn't really quote Tom's hardware since they are just amateurs like us.
The restriction on 1980i is that you cannot use US components. This has been clear for several weeks now. If German suppliers have US components, then they just need to de-americanize also. At the end of the days, companies will always try to make sales when possible. As long as there is a small opening, they will go for it.
What's important is what ASML says. And they do not think the new restrictions will change their revenue in China region.
What the Japanese decide to ban is not relevant to what ASML can offer.
Until we have more to contradict that from ASML, it's pointless to get all alarmist and stuff
they can try, but the physical equipment is in China, its a complex process involving many tricky unit operations to separate elements of similar chemical reactivity, and many of the secrets in rare earth processing aren't patents but are trade secrets.i am not sure if that is a good idea. US and western countries can then ignore the rare earth processing patents.