Quite the nerve they have. Well, yes, why should Micron be given the right to compete effectively with China when Chinese companies are getting banned left and right based on nothing? It's only fair for American companies to be treated the same in China. Plus Micron already tried to brain drain Chinese engineers when it closed its office in Shanghai, it should be one of the first to be banned from Chinese market.Micron Stock Tumbles After China Says It Will Review Chip Sales in Key Market.
Cyberspace Administration of China, one of the country’s main technology regulators, said Friday that it was implementing a cybersecurity review of products sold by Micron in China.
It confirms a risk that Micron raised in its latest annual report, when the group flagged that “the Chinese government may restrict us from participating in the China market or may prevent us from competing effectively with Chinese companies.”
well Biden administration is getting what it deserves for turning memory chips into a national security issue.Micron Stock Tumbles After China Says It Will Review Chip Sales in Key Market.
Cyberspace Administration of China, one of the country’s main technology regulators, said Friday that it was implementing a cybersecurity review of products sold by Micron in China.
It confirms a risk that Micron raised in its latest annual report, when the group flagged that “the Chinese government may restrict us from participating in the China market or may prevent us from competing effectively with Chinese companies.”
It's an inverse problem.What’s so mysterious about optical metrology?
Cramer approveMicron Stock Tumbles After China Says It Will Review Chip Sales in Key Market.
Cyberspace Administration of China, one of the country’s main technology regulators, said Friday that it was implementing a cybersecurity review of products sold by Micron in China.
It confirms a risk that Micron raised in its latest annual report, when the group flagged that “the Chinese government may restrict us from participating in the China market or may prevent us from competing effectively with Chinese companies.”
Seems Huazhong SciTech U State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology working w/ this issueIt's an inverse problem.
You can't extract information from the results directly like you can with X-ray or electron, which directly from images or spectra that can be directly measured and interpreted. It is literally just like looking at it with your eyes, just enhanced a bit by your instrument.
For optical CD, the optical scattering patterns by itself is meaningless, since you physically cannot extract sub wavelength imaging information directly. Instead there will be hints, but just hints, in the scattering patterns. You have to theoretically calculate the scattering patterns with N free parameters, and see if they fit your model.
My brain has trouble with trusting inverse problems as there's always the doubt of "but what if the model is wrong/incomplete".
Imaging and spectral data is different. You are directly observing the property of interest. It is model free. The CD is directly observed.
It is like the difference between directly observing a crime happen and piecing a crime together with a forensic team. There's some cases that are airtight, some cases confuse for decades, and sometimes bias puts the wrong guy in jail. But direct observation always works.
I'm sure there are people in China working on this. I personally don't understand these things so I have a hard time evaluating them.Seems Huazhong SciTech U State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology working w/ this issue