Interesting observation. Would this mean that SN2 is dedicated to N+2 and the existing SN1 is dedicated to 14/12/N+1 then?
Chinese semiconductor industry
- Thread starter Hendrik_2000
- Start date
- Status
Beijing Shuoke Zhongkexin (CETC semiconductors) signed a total of 11 new machines (ion implanters) at the beginning of the year, and the total contract value exceeded 200 million yuan
Jiweiwang news, on January 9, Beijing Shuoke Zhongkexin Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Beijing Shuoke Zhongkexin") announced that a total of 11 new machines were signed at the beginning of the year, and the total contract amount exceeded 200 million yuan.
It is reported that Beijing Shuoke Zhongkexin was established in 2019. The company originated from the 48th Research Institute of CETC. It is an earlier high-end equipment supplier in China that focuses on the ion implanter business in the integrated circuit field. In the 1960s, it began to study ion implanters, and successively undertook the research tasks of major projects such as 90-65nm medium beam current and 45-22nm large beam current. The four products of ion implanter and customized ion implanter have built a relatively systematic pedigree of integrated circuit ion implanters.
In August 2022, Beijing Shuoke Zhongkexin's fourth medium-beam ion implanter was successfully Move-in in an integrated circuit production line; in September of the same year, Beijing Shuoke Zhongkexin medium-beam ion implanter was successfully delivered.
I don't have the answer to that one. Simply relaying the original poster. My guess is their product can be used in both Arf dry and immersion machines as @tokenanalyst posted below.
8 deliveries from 2020 to 2022 for 8 prototypes of both dry & immersion at different stages of development cycle seems reasonable figure.
Right, no need for people to panic about U-Precision. It seems like they set out to do this from a few years back and they have delivered quite a few of their product already and they will be ready to deliver more once the testing & validation is finished. Just need to ge the funding to ramp up.
Well, I think it's safe to just assume that most if not all of SN1 is dedicated to 14/12/N+1 and probably heavily tilted to 12 at this point. Others would know better than I do here. If 12 is just an improvement over 14, how much work is required to convert the 14 nm to 12nm process or is that not worth the time? It seems like a lot of the chips we are discussing recently are using 12nm process. I think N+1 right now is still new and they are still working up the yield and complexity on them. If say 10k out of 35k wpm are N+1, then its likely they can still increase throughput on that capacity as they improve their process.
I have no idea about SN2. We will see if they can get the tools they need. My impression has been that finding tools even to fully buildout SN1 was not easy. And that lithography machines are not the missing piece. There are other tools that are hard for them to acquire. I'd imagine it would be far easier for them to put in additional 12nm and N+1 capacity than N+2. But reading along the grapevine, it does seem like they are still seeing a path to produce N+2 chips over the next 2 years.
Remember that was back in 2021 !!
China is making progress in the matter of weeks !!
For academic purposes... article is nothing new and has similar commentary posted many times over
Yeah, as I suspected, Xi Jinping blah blah blah Biden blah blah sanctions blah blah blah YMTC blah blah corruption blah blah blah allies blah blah blah. in summary the same robotic garbage in repeat. What a shock.
Always the same retarded droning in that Bloomberg article I agree. I will just add that Tsinghua's Unigroup's former CEO was not just responsible for disasters like would seem if you read the article. After all they funded and nurtured YMTC into being and that was pretty successful. A bit too successful one would say. I do think Spreadtrum kind of lagged behind after he acquired the company and put it under UNISOC however. MediaTek still has way better offerings. And pretty much everything UNISOC makes which is in demand is made at TSMC which is risky to say the least. UNISOC also has zero RISC-V offerings. I think it is reductive to only design chips for smartphone and tablets, but whatever, more work for Rockchip I guess. Not that Rockchip is much better with them making their chips at GlobalFoundries.
His major downfall was the shady land deals he made for those NAND and DRAM fabs Unigroup were supposed to build, other than YMTC, which never went anywhere. I also think he spent on way too diverse investments and to a large degree his business model makes little sense. I was never much of a fan of conglomerates. Typically lead to mediocrity.
His major downfall was the shady land deals he made for those NAND and DRAM fabs Unigroup were supposed to build, other than YMTC, which never went anywhere. I also think he spent on way too diverse investments and to a large degree his business model makes little sense. I was never much of a fan of conglomerates. Typically lead to mediocrity.
Last edited:
- Status