Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Looks @ansy1968 posted an English translation of the Lam employee interview that I had previously linked to but got deleted.
here is a new link
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I have also saved it in case they delete it again.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

My thoughts on that interview since it's given from the perspective of a Lam employee in charge of servicing CXMT. Tt was conducted before Oct 12th. Pretty much everything here checks out from the point of view of a Lam employee except for his assumption that Green card holders can continue to work with Chinese semiconductor industry.

From this interview, it's quite clear that American tools providers are done in China. For American firms, they simply cannot fully service their Chinese clients without some involvement from Americans. It's unclear if these rules will be loosened but certainly it makes sense for non-American firms to keep their American employees out of interaction with Chinese semiconductor industry on whether or not they want to pick their career vs citizenship. There is no reason ASML or Japanese firms cannot service Chinese customers as long as American citizens are not involved. As it is well known, ASML has over 1500 employees in China, so should have no issue servicing Chinese clients. For American execs in China like Gerald Yin, they will have to decide whether or not they want to keep their citizenship. Imo, we will get a mix of both. Without giving these people some time, it's unclear how they will decide. And even if they do decide to keep their job, it may take a while for them to legally give up their American status, which would keep them from working in their position for a while. Overall, 200 Americans for the entire Chinese IC industry is not a lot of people.

He made it clear that Lam will have to do massive layoffs in China and local Chinese employees will likely be hired by CXMT/YMTC to continue servicing the Lam machines they already have. The only issue is spares. However, Fujian Jinhua has shown that these spares can be sourced from other countries. A lot of the components aren't even American. So, there should be minimal effect to current production or upcoming production that have already received their machines. YMTC has been clear they have been stocking up.

Even so, future expansion will likely be stopped unless CXMT/YMTC can source those tools locally or from Japan. It is likely that Japanese companies will benefit big time from this. AMEC currently cannot fully replace Lam products according to this Lam employee. Nand production relies on more etching equipment than your logic chip production, so AMEC still has some work to do. This will affect both YMTC and CXMT. Unclear how much this will slow them down. Keep in mind that as long as the American content is below 25%, it can continue to be sold to China. That includes the precious ASML DUVi scanners that SMIC currently relies on in its advanced node fab.

While it is possible that YMTC/CXMT/SMIC/HLMC can receive American tools that are not "banned", they have to sign agreement with US gov't to assure that those production will not be used for military or other sensitive purpose. They are unlikely to sign this. As such, they are essentially getting the Fujian Jinhua treatment or the entire Chinese IC industry is getting Jinhua treatment. It's unclear to me how much service a mature node fab can get from American companies.

Lam employee admits that Jiading ICRD and SMIC's SMSC fab can already operate without American tools. As such, there is no reason that advanced processes in China will be stopped by this. He also recognizes that SMSC can already produce both 7 and 14 nm chips without Lam product. Again, it seems like the issue is production level from Chinese tools makers rather than capability. That's how Chinese tools makers continue to win greater % of bids we see, especially between NAURA and AMEC. With the number of Chinese employees that AMAT/LAM/KLA will have to let go, the logical conclusion is that they will join their Chinese competitors or the fabs that use them. As such, this level of knowledge/personnel transfer is likely to have huge impact on the product development and expansion plan of Chinese tools makers.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Well looks like is China for the Eurasians now on, US companies heavily absent in the new biddings. With Japan taking more prominence.

[One-week bidding/bidding] Shanghai Jita added 7 new equipment for bidding, Shanghai Microelectronics added 1 new bid-winning equipment, and North China Innovation added 1 bid-winning equipment​


View attachment 99572

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

this is great and quite predictive. As I said when that Lam interview came out, I don't see how Chinese fabs can continue to buy American tools if they know it won't get serviced. Even if they can somehow get around that, US gov't will probably require the fabs to sign some compliance agreement and such. It really doesn't make sense for Chinese fabs when there are other companies that can fill those orders.

I'd be curious what the lithography machine from SMEE is? Maybe they sold another front end scanner? I think the obvious implication of these sanction (and how broad they are) is that Chinese firms will now take that into consideration when buying front end scanners. Even if SMEE's product isn't as good as ASML (from technical, serviceability and support point of view), the nightmarish scenario of having product support interrupted in the middle of expanding your fab will overcome a lot of that. Chinese players can only get better from more cooperation with local fabs.

@tokenanalyst do you know how many people are employed by AMAT/Lam/KLA in China? I'd be curious how trained staff their Chinese competitors and local fabs will now have access to. They will inevitably have to downsize in China. I don't see how AMAT can continue to be not more pessimistic about its Chinese presence.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"Remarkably, however, the new measures seem even more restrictive. The list of controlled items includes lithography equipment capable of “production of a pattern size of less than 2.5 micrometers” and “using a light source wavelength shorter than 400 nanometers.” Commercial 250nm manufacturing started in the late nineties of the previous century."

This is a passage out of the document the US put out once the sanctions came out. The US is retarded. Do they really think China cannot make their own lithography machines at all? 400nm. I think even the Soviets could do that. i-line is 365nm. Unless by 400 nm they mean He lamps. So KrF, ArF and EUV would be sanctioned then. Still retarded.
I mean it was clear that ASML hasn't been banned in this round of sanctions and same with Japanese tools makers. Sorry @european_guy , I'd agree with the assessment that ASML lithography machines will eventually be sanctioned, but I don't think it will be as chaotic as this US sanction. At minimum, I think Dutch gov't could strike a compromise of setting a deadline by end of next year and allow continued support.

If you are SMIC/YMTC/HLMC/CXMT, you really just need ASML lithography machines (especially the NXT 2050i and 2100i) to be imported for another year. With the industry slow down, there simply won't be as much demand for DUVi from non-Chinese fabs as before.

As I said before, any additional time where China can procure ASML scanners or Intel/AMD server chips is a bonus. The fact that US gov't wasn't able to get any international partner on board with this major push really reduced its effectiveness.

The first domestically produced analog full-process EDA, the simulation supports 5nm process​

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
This is great. It's unclear to me which EDA process they still don't support, but it just doesn't seem to me that developing 5 nm EDA is as complex as developing advanced front end scanners. It's just software. With enough customer support, there is no reason Chinese EDA firms will lag other parts of its development.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Is more like cutting your arm without anesthetic or even whisky with a dull table knife. The biggest lost could be not just revenue but trust and relationships that was built over decades.

View attachment 99593
I see they have 27000 employees worldwide and this was from 2018, so they are probably well over 2000 in China. I think I saw that AMEC only had like 1000 employees. Huge employment opportunity for AMEC and NAURA.
 

resistance

Junior Member
Registered Member
About geopolitics, I still wonder why Saudi Arabia and UAE go for semiconductor? Especially when they currently have leverage against many European right now for energy. I think They can even force the dutch to give EUV tech
 

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member
About geopolitics, I still wonder why Saudi Arabia and UAE go for semiconductor? Especially when they currently have leverage against many European right now for energy. I think They can even force the dutch to give EUV tech
Not a big enough internal market, from what i'm told EUV was actually possible because you had the western and Chinese market consuming consumer electronic that needed sub 7nm nodes.

Will western only markets be enough in the medium future to have multiple 3nm suppliers. Or will the American Intel semi forge eat up all the demand from western chip designers designing 3nm consumer products..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top