Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pkp88

Junior Member
Registered Member
there are 40 types of etching machines in 3D nand production. Last year China could only fulfill half of them.

The big deal could be KLA, it seems that YTMC and KLA collaborated a lot. Fortunately, there are Chinese companies that are making inroads into the metrology and yield process department in China that, with some work, could replace KLA, if they are not collaborating already.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
So they have some lines in place with this equipment. Imagine they can plug the hole short term by hiring ex Chinese KLA/AMAT/LAM employees. In parallel have to work with AMEC / Chinese KLA substitutes to rip out that equipment over time. Question really is how far off the second step is / doesn't need to be cutting edge just enough for FinFet equivalent processes
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
SMIC Beijing, SMIC Shenzhen and SMIC Jiading will be online in the next few months. This add huge capacity into 28nm process.

SMIC expansion plan are mostly domestic equipment. They also found solution to their 14nm process.
Yeah, it's quite impressive what they have done. I think they won't be that affected outside of near term inconvenience of losing servicing. Only asml stop delivering scanners would really delay their expansion.

And the solutions for 14 nm is probably sufficient for n+1. And if they can do it, hlmc should be able to do it with their 14 nm process.

there are 40 types of etching machines in 3D nand production. Last year China could only fulfill half of them.
Interesting, it wonder if they can get some of the equipment from Japanese. The lam interview definitely made it sound like cxmt and ymtc expansion are most likely to get delayed.

Not great for them, but most likely just a short term blip. It's not like nand flash itself is being sanctioned.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Meh, us is trying to decouple and china is not. So, you will end up with a situation where china can still function as a society without American imports and not the other way around. It makes sense for china to continue ingrain itself deeper into the American supply chain.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
This US sanctions are horrible timed. The stooges on DC couldn't have put this restrictions at a worst moment.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Luckily for ASML if they manage to keep their DUVi scanners Non American they could made up by using the stockpiling of this tools in China.

It is perfectly timed for midterm elections.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
IMO, most of all, the thing that its interesting is that AFAIK, china hasnt revealed any plans to retaliate against the US because of this ban. Why is that?
Because all these bans do is make China progress faster. Before this tech war, nobody in China was interested in working in lithography, just making profits buying foreign tech. Chinese leaders told them that this is critical technology they must master, but nobody listened because it wasn't profitable. Now they are finally working like the Manhattan Project to get advanced lithography fully indigenized. This doesn't need retaliation against America; this merits a "Thank you" card taped to a bouquet of flowers and a basket of fruits, wines, and cheeses.

China is now a scientist working in his lab making progress every hour; America is the desperate crazy person shouting at him from outside, making noise hoping to stop him from innovating. What is the scientist's best "retaliation?" Just keep working LOL
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Summary:
In short, America’s
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
—zero-sum thinkers who urgently want to accelerate technological decoupling—have won the strategy debate inside the Biden administration. More cautious voices—technocrats and centrists who advocate incremental curbs on select aspects of China’s tech ties—have lost.
This shift portends even harsher U.S. measures to come, not only in advanced computing but also in other sectors (like biotech, manufacturing, and finance) deemed strategic. The pace and details are uncertain, but the strategic objective and political commitment are now clearer than ever. China’s technological rise will be slowed at any price.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
So they have some lines in place with this equipment. Imagine they can plug the hole short term by hiring ex Chinese KLA/AMAT/LAM employees. In parallel have to work with AMEC / Chinese KLA substitutes to rip out that equipment over time. Question really is how far off the second step is / doesn't need to be cutting edge just enough for FinFet equivalent processes
No need to rip out. Just use what you have until they’re up on their maintenance cycle and if you can’t service them to a level that would make sense to not replace them you replace them then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top