Regain China citizenship is just a snap of a finger.A must read.
China's 'sea turtle' tech executives stranded by U.S. crackdown
Chinese Americans at top chipmakers snared by U.S. new export ban.
Source:
Non paywall source:
Even non Chinese companies in china won't get USA tools and services for semiconductor companies.Regain China citizenship is just a snap of a finger.
More stringent things have been successfully done in the name of national security.
Overall this is a very rational move for the US to make, as they clearly are seeing semiconductor mastery as one of the key prerequisites of national power in economic, military and scientific domains, and thus national security and hegemony.
Breaking a couple of eggs or a few tens of thousands would be well worth the price.
I also do not expect this will be the most stringent of measures the US will put in either. Going forwards, I expect attempts for more far reaching measures and more severe punishments to be enacted as they become more sensitive (or one may argue, desperate).
Exactly, this is something that US government doesn't seem to understand. You can just buy more of the older chips to get the same effect. Maybe it will take great electricity usage and space, but you can still fully build out your data centers. I'm actually more concerned if China's cloud services can't offer certain CPUs to cloud customers, since that might drive them to AWS or Azure. But as of now, we haven't got there. I think the implication is that Chinese tech companies need to quickly make Chinese server CPUs to customers.I agree they will just limit H100 speed, but the point here is that AI training / inference is not like lithography: EUV is an enabler to manufacture chips beyond a certain node, instead a faster GPU is just that, a faster GPU.
NVIDIA V100 is about 3 times slower than the freshly banned A100.
But this does not yield to any hard limit on what you can or can't do in AI. Training will be just 3 times slower, that's it....or maybe you end up buying more V100 to still get similar result.
AI is mainly software and cannot be blocked (also because all main AI frameworks are open source), I agree it can be convenient to have a faster GPU, but is not an enabler by itself.
A much more serious impact will have the banning of foundry services for firms like Biren or Horizon Robotics.
But it is worth noting, that nowadays US must rely on foreign countries to be effective, in this case on Taiwan's TSMC halting foundry services for advanced nodes. US alone is already impotent against China. But to rely on foreign countries, essentially it means to arm-twist and coerce developed world's nations. The impact of persistent intimidation and bullying is difficult to foresee, we all have been teached since childhood that it will be negative in the long term.
I mean this was rushed through before midterms without any buy-in from international partners. I'm not sure how much more expansive these regulations can get without buy-in from ASML and Japanese suppliers.I am almost certain that Trump will win a second term in 2024 and if that happens this administration has set the bar so low for Republicans that god damn boys we are going to have a lot fun in the SinoDefenseForum with all the crap that will come.
I actually think that between woke Dems and MAGA, MAGA is more negotiable. Woke neolib Dems did Ukraine and escalated the semiconductor crisis at great cost to their own industry. At least Trump had the sense to back off ZTE.and usually end up hurting more than benefiting, nothing comes free in life and some things end up costing more than others, like the failure of the China initiative. The U.S has been losing its appeal as a talent destination currently because a multitude of issues. Policies to harm people in the name of national security it could make that appeal lost even greater. It could make international companies and even US companies reconsider hiring US citizens, it could accelerate the outsourcing of US jobs. Is has been accelerating right now. Basically the goverment has make their own citizens a liability for companies.
With this and FDPR the US on the way of making their semiconductor industry a national security minefield, an unappealing place with unreliable products, a place that some people may dont want to be and worst given the fact that the software industry and the financial industry has more appeal in the US than hard engineering.
But who I am telling a group of Harvard lawyers in Washington D.C that the best way to win a race is to run faster and not shooting yourself in the foot? They know better what it the best for their country, they know better than anyone else, they know better than the engineers, the scientist and the researchers.
Yes, is gonna get worse, as I said before the US is on a downward spiral towards full blown fascism, every single administration just set the bar even lower than the administration before. I am almost certain that Trump will win a second term in 2024 and if that happens this administration has set the bar so low for Republicans that god damn boys we are going to have a lot fun in the SinoDefenseForum with all the crap that will come.
This one probably has a lot of implications. Time for the Koreans to move to using Chinese suppliers.
Even non Chinese companies in china won't get USA tools and services for semiconductor companies.
This one probably has a lot of implications. Time for the Koreans to move to using Chinese suppliers.
In the marathon between US - China, you win by constantly trying to trip your opponent (sanctions and bans, which will continue going forward) and/or outrun your opponent (e.g, Chips and Science Act). China's best option is also the latter; heads down, work hard, innovate, leapfrog, etc.Yes, US strategy is to try to delay and hinder Chinese advancement and innovation -- China's strategy is to try and speed up their own advancement and innovation.
There are some rather simple assumptions that underlie both nation's strategies and those assumptions are even diametrically opposed to each other. (Basically in terms of China's ability to advance and innovate at speed, and ability to do so domestically and so on)
Time will tell which of those sets of assumptions prove true.