More customer for SMIC N+2 7nm chip, the Americans are making SMIC great again.Hanbo Semiconductor introduces domestic 7nm SG100 cloud GPU chip, integrating rendering, AI and video
View attachment 96801
Sir from your previous post about Huawei new chip introduction for next year, it's 7nm rather than 14nm or both?Hanbo Semiconductor introduces domestic 7nm SG100 cloud GPU chip, integrating rendering, AI and video
View attachment 96801
Maybe SMIC had already consulted them about the N+2 progress and their mass production plan?All these new companies use 7nm or less advanced nodes. It is very wise for them not to use nodes below 7nm.
14nm stacking will be used for 7xx and 8xx . chips 7nm will be for kirin 9xx chipsSir from your previous post about Huawei new chip introduction for next year, it's 7nm rather than 14nm or both?
14nm stacking will be used for 7xx and 8xx . chips 7nm will be for kirin 9xx chips
Decoupling has been started and west wants to push the final button with china vs taiwan war , so for tike being they are creating alternate supply chain that's what they say about china +1 strategy and bringing critical semiconductor manufacturing back to west so that during war they won't end with entire disruption in digital technology devices.
according to thisThis GPU ban is making me uncomfortable. I have to laugh at the timing since it came literally like a day after Biren announced its competitor to the nVidia chips. Unfortunately Biren GP100 isn't available yet, and there's no idea how many they can make (or if it can actually compete with the nVidia chips)
BR100 will start mass production before the end of the year. They have in fact already started shipping.观察者网从大会现场获悉,BR100将在今年年底实现量产。
hmm, read thisBut the GPUs that the US is banning is pretty fundamental to supercomputing now. This isn't banning "finished" products, this is like banning hammers and nails. Very, very advanced hammers and nails, for which while there are alternatives, the alternatives are unknown in a field where familiarity is very valuable.
point is, China has built its super computers on 14 nm processes. This actually doesn't bite that much. In the long run, it does hurt China's cloud server providers, which is why all the major ones are probably looking at BR100 right now and have invested in others.What we don’t understand is why the restrictions stop at the top-end GPU engines. Why not all GPUs? While it is difficult, both China and Russia could build working exascale supercomputers using Nvidia P100 and V100 GPUs or even AMD Instinct MI50 or MI100 GPUs.
Thanks for posting the links to their capabilities. It seems like BR100 is way ahead of the other ones. I'd assume BR100 will come out of this looking pretty good as the high end GPU since they will be competitive against even H100. While the other ones are probably going to serve in the lower end GPU market. If Chinese cloud service providers and data centers are smart, they'd pick these Chinese options over Nvidia even in the non-banned category.Enflame uses a 12nm technology, unknown foundry
Biren uses 7nm process from TSMC
Cambricon uses 7nm process from TSMC
Hanbo Semiconductor uses a 7nm technology, unknown foundry
Yes, that's the key point. Even BR100 uses 7 nm process. Although, it does seem like 5 nm is possible with DUV so maybe that's what the next generation server CPU/GPUs will use.All these new companies use 7nm or less advanced nodes. It is very wise for them not to use nodes below 7nm.
I think American strategy would work better if they just banned more stuff to China earlier. But they only banned EUV to all of China (before SMIC was really ready to move to 5 nm process) and banned Huawei. As such, China could still buy more equipment and all the chips until now. China has gotten a few years to figure things out. And as we've seen, China is figuring things out.This is a perfect example of typical US wishful-plan, that works well on paper but then faces an unpleasant reality check down the road.
US is the master of these kind of ill-thought-out plans, see Afghanistan, Iraq and I am waiting for Ukraine that will backfire too sooner or later (regarding energy prices and inflation already has). Or see Huawei ban, with the consequential furious push of China for technology independence and the spread of Huawei engineers and knowledge across the full Chinese ecosystem. My personal opinion is that the ban on Huawei is a bless in disguised, the fall of a big tree has enabled the growth of the forest around it. US has worked as an ideal antitrust authority for China, free of charge.
TSMC has 61% market share on advanced nodes below 16nm
And by far the largest part of it is for serving US customers. Who thinks that after 2025 / 2026 all this will be moot and expendable just because by then Intel will open a fab or two is very delusional. US will continue to rely on Taiwan for a very long time, in fact for much longer than China.