Sure. Make the most of what you are forced to do anyways.
It is fairly obvious that this expands the control the US government has over TSMC and any other company that enters the US. Also the design of this makes it hard to unwind should the political winds in Taiwan ever change. I would not be surprised if TSMC's business in China ends up being subject to approval by the US government on a case by case basis.
However it is not obvious how it is going to end; over a ten year period companies come and go and it is not given that TSMC will be the dominant company in Taiwan it is today.
Also the latest Intel earnings shows that there is quite a big hole in US semiconductor production that these subsidies need to cover.
Yes, the novelty I see in this law is that US has, for the first time (please correct me if I'm wrong) bounded a grant to support investment in US to the prohibition to invest in an unrelated third country.
I guess this has no legal base under any international trade law.
It is very bad and very dangerous what happened. I agree it means business in China ends up being subject to approval by the US government on a case by case basis.
I am quite appealed at how Taiwan and SK firms apparently accepted it without a glitch. I have the impression this is just a kind of legal/contractual framework to actually have a (totally fabricated) base for approving / rejecting investment in China of a non-US company.
I am not sure on the practical impact of such a rule, probably not a lot because new investment in China by big foreign semiconductor firms is already difficult today and not foreseen in the future (apart from TSMC in Nanjing fab), but from the point of view of the expanding of US long-arm jurisdiction, this is a big news and an important precedent.
A win for US, a loss for the rest of the world.