Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
And if I do, will you acknowledge it, or look for a reason for why it doesn't count? It's likely a waste of time and a waste of (metaphorical breath).

As a matter of fact not long ago on the topic of semiconductors I wrote:

Lo and behold,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
have been announced against Chinese chipmakers targeting advanced node production equipment.
The ban on 14nm was in the works way before that 7nm chip was in MSM. It was pretty obvious

Can you list another time you guessed right? Even a broken clock so right twice a day. Just saying, time will tell how this is going to go down.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
15 or 20 more years of these policies and the truth will begin to come into view
What truth. Made in China 2025 was started in 2015. 7 years later and the whole West is panicking in front of China's prowess. If they couldn't handle the initial (imo clumsy) start of China's R&D efforts, what hopes do they have to compete with a fully accelerating China consisting of mature R&D institutions and efficient R&D/IP/Tech-transfer mechanisms?



I knew the arrest of this MIIT guy was bad news. It seems as I said, the U.S. and China want the same thing for Chinese tech: destruction.
Only in your mind does a single person's removal affects an organisation as bad as you claim. In your previous post where you claimEd that the MIIT "agency was doomed" because a simple minister was removed, I countered your point quite comprehensively but (not) strangely enough I still haven't heard back from you...

Now, here you are again, peddling the same bs. I think we can reasonably conclude that you are arguing in bad faith here
 

gadgetcool5

Senior Member
Registered Member
The ban on 14nm was in the works way before that 7nm chip was in MSM. It was pretty obvious

Can you list another time you guessed right? Even a broken clock so right twice a day. Just saying, time will tell how this is going to go down.
I guessed right that people here would find a reason to discount that time. In other words, that this is a waste of time. I've said what I have to say, and I reiterate my prediction that nothing further will change anyone's mind on this topic. If someone is really curious to hear my views in more detail and actually has an open mind and wants to discuss in good faith (and receive the same in return), my PM's are open, or post in this thread saying so, but people who can only offer snarky stuff or put up goalposts that keep moving, are not contributing to a serious or substantive discussion.

I countered your point quite comprehensively but (not) strangely enough I still haven't heard back from you...
No you didn't. Do you really want to know why? And if I tell you why, would you really approach the topic in good faith?
 
Last edited:

visitor123

New Member
Registered Member
And if I do, will you acknowledge it, or look for a reason for why it doesn't count? It's likely a waste of time and a waste of (metaphorical breath).

As a matter of fact not long ago on the topic of semiconductors I wrote:

Lo and behold,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
have been announced against Chinese chipmakers targeting advanced node production equipment.
but you are wrong. 1 week before that news broke, they have already decided to stop China at 14nm. Now unless, 7 > 14...

Try again.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
As a matter of fact not long ago on the topic of semiconductors I wrote:
Lo and behold,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
have been announced against Chinese chipmakers targeting advanced node production equipment.
Big brain moment. What's next? Are you going to predict that China and America are going to have a bad relationship?

2q9amd.jpg
 

mrandolph

New Member
Registered Member
TSMC's Former General Counsel Richard Thurston on the CHIPSAct : use it as the opportunity to get more involved in the US.
Sure. Make the most of what you are forced to do anyways.

It is fairly obvious that this expands the control the US government has over TSMC and any other company that enters the US. Also the design of this makes it hard to unwind should the political winds in Taiwan ever change. I would not be surprised if TSMC's business in China ends up being subject to approval by the US government on a case by case basis.

However it is not obvious how it is going to end; over a ten year period companies come and go and it is not given that TSMC will be the dominant company in Taiwan it is today.

Also the latest Intel earnings shows that there is quite a big hole in US semiconductor production that these subsidies need to cover.
 

olalavn

Senior Member
Registered Member
Sure. Make the most of what you are forced to do anyways.

It is fairly obvious that this expands the control the US government has over TSMC and any other company that enters the US. Also the design of this makes it hard to unwind should the political winds in Taiwan ever change. I would not be surprised if TSMC's business in China ends up being subject to approval by the US government on a case by case basis.

However it is not obvious how it is going to end; over a ten year period companies come and go and it is not given that TSMC will be the dominant company in Taiwan it is today.

Also the latest Intel earnings shows that there is quite a big hole in US semiconductor production that these subsidies need to cover.
it won't affect China... on the contrary, it will harm their semiconductor chain more... the raw material for making chips China is holding it.... special gas...
 

PopularScience

Junior Member
Registered Member

At the end of the day the Chinese "gradualists" and the Chinese "endophobes" are losing the narrative battle. China needs to move on, increase R&D in this area, even with the state absorbing some or most of the cost. Invest, encourage and redirect companies close to the semiconductor industry to become suppliers. Make an effort to localize as close to 100% of the most mature nodes as possible to create a virtuous circle among local providers. Tell these people that if they are not going to sell their advanced technology, they will not be allowed to monopolize the mature market.​
Yes. U-Precision received subsidy 300 millions RMB from the government each year. This is just for the double stage wafer component.
 

european_guy

Junior Member
Registered Member
Sure. Make the most of what you are forced to do anyways.

It is fairly obvious that this expands the control the US government has over TSMC and any other company that enters the US. Also the design of this makes it hard to unwind should the political winds in Taiwan ever change. I would not be surprised if TSMC's business in China ends up being subject to approval by the US government on a case by case basis.

However it is not obvious how it is going to end; over a ten year period companies come and go and it is not given that TSMC will be the dominant company in Taiwan it is today.

Also the latest Intel earnings shows that there is quite a big hole in US semiconductor production that these subsidies need to cover.

Yes, the novelty I see in this law is that US has, for the first time (please correct me if I'm wrong) bounded a grant to support investment in US to the prohibition to invest in an unrelated third country.

I guess this has no legal base under any international trade law.

It is very bad and very dangerous what happened. I agree it means business in China ends up being subject to approval by the US government on a case by case basis.

I am quite appealed at how Taiwan and SK firms apparently accepted it without a glitch. I have the impression this is just a kind of legal/contractual framework to actually have a (totally fabricated) base for approving / rejecting investment in China of a non-US company.

I am not sure on the practical impact of such a rule, probably not a lot because new investment in China by big foreign semiconductor firms is already difficult today and not foreseen in the future (apart from TSMC in Nanjing fab), but from the point of view of the expanding of US long-arm jurisdiction, this is a big news and an important precedent.

A win for US, a loss for the rest of the world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top