@hvpc Bro sorry for the late reply, wife ask me to accompany her for grocery, so I had to comply....lol here is
@Oldschool respond to your question and I said it again SMIC dual approach is the best solution, Your argument holds merits , like
@weig2000 had previously stated, it can use ASML equipment while waiting for the domestic alternative to mature. This year is the expected introduction of the domestic 14nm line, which Huawei hope the Beijing SMIC can FAB their 14nm 3D chiplet. Now I don't know IF Washington DC can sanction a whole company IF a subsidiary within legal Prudence (non usage of US equipment and materials) supply Huawei.
Junior Member
Registered Member
Today at 1:55 PMNew
My answer to hvpc question on Beijing SMIC JV
ASML DUV is non US .
It was few years back, that Huawei was banned under Trump, it cannot use US tech to manufacture it's chips.
At that time, Beijing SMIC was planned. It was expected to pick up Huawei business, and therefore explicit demand for non US equipments.
I read somewhere in the news back then, you might want to dig around for that. Few years ago.
Actually other fabs use more domestic equipments and it just that SMIC don't trust them and never really qualify them.
So, Beijing JV demanded SMIC to qualify more domestic equipments and have to be non US so it can service the likes of Huawei. ASML is non US, so it shouldnt be a problem.