Chinese Rail Transport Appreciation & News

Gogurt4ever

New Member
Registered Member
The route directly connecting Zhujiang New Town CBD in GZ with Qianhai CBD in Shenzhen would make the most sense. However there are already multiple HSR lines connecting the three cities. I don’t find the Maglev necessary. On the other hand, once tunnelling costs could be further reduced, a maglev line (or direct HSR travelling 350+ kph) connecting Shanghai and Guangzhou might be necessary because there are currently no direct lines connecting Shanghai with the Greater Bay Area. All high speed trains travelling between the GBA and Shanghai take at least six hours, which defeat the very purpose of HSR.
It's questionable whether local governments should spend money on such projects when there is already sufficient infrastructure, especially in the current economic climate. On the other hand: this is not a bridge in Guizhou -- the greater bay area is the backbone of China's economy and innovation potential. Greater connectivity between cities (which reduces felt distance, and massively helps to integrate these cities) could have massive benefits. Having the world's first high-usage, long-distance, and truly high-speed maglev also has reputational implications, of course.
 

Andy1974

Senior Member
Registered Member
It's questionable whether local governments should spend money on such projects when there is already sufficient infrastructure, especially in the current economic climate. On the other hand: this is not a bridge in Guizhou -- the greater bay area is the backbone of China's economy and innovation potential. Greater connectivity between cities (which reduces felt distance, and massively helps to integrate these cities) could have massive benefits. Having the world's first high-usage, long-distance, and truly high-speed maglev also has reputational implications, of course.
I think the need is because of a new national maglev network, one that can get from Hong Kong all the way to Urumqi, hence why it is needed despite existing infrastructure.
 

ChongqingHotPot92

Junior Member
Registered Member
I think the need is because of a new national maglev network, one that can get from Hong Kong all the way to Urumqi, hence why it is needed despite existing infrastructure.
The cost would be prohibitive in this case. Also, by the time such national maglev network were to finish (say well after 2030), China would likely have already figured out how to make the C919 and C929 with 100% domestic components. Travelling from HK/GBA to Urumqi using domestic airliners would be much more affordable and realistic compared to building an entire maglev network (which costs much more than conventional HSRs).
 

Andy1974

Senior Member
Registered Member
The cost would be prohibitive in this case. Also, by the time such national maglev network were to finish (say well after 2030), China would likely have already figured out how to make the C919 and C929 with 100% domestic components. Travelling from HK/GBA to Urumqi using domestic airliners would be much more affordable and realistic compared to building an entire maglev network (which costs much more than conventional HSRs).
China has a robot that lays 2km of HSR per day, including all the track and overheat wires. Maglev, is much simpler. China has just instituted a program to reduce the costs of key next Gen materials, including those used by maglev.
 

Andy1974

Senior Member
Registered Member
Bigger shipping containers for intermodal rail:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The 50-foot containers are independently developed by China State Railway Group Co., Ltd. (China Railway), each with a weight of 36 tonnes and a load capacity of 30.85 tonnes. The volume of these containers reaches 114.4 cubic meters, a 50 percent increase over that of 40-foot international standard containers
Does anyone know the width and height?
 
Top