I'm aware that I'm not a party to your and engineer's two way debate. nevertheless, some of your observations are relevant to my analysis. particularly, your above observation raises the question as to whether a chinese participation in the su-35 program would require any logistical sacrifices, by either party, at all.
as i have previously observed, here, shenyang has established its proficiency in constructing and developing the flanker airframe. consequently, we can reasonably expect that there are significant degrees of commonality between sukhoi's and shenyang's processes in this regard. additionally, i believe that the j-11a/b program has established shenyang's capabilities in marrying sukhoi's airframe (and saturn's engines) with chinese avionics, electronics, and weaponry. subsequently, they have further developed these capabilities with the development of the j-15 and j-16.
consequently, as shenyang is already constructing flanker derived airframes (which the su-35 airframe is), outfitting them with chinese avionics and electronics, and equipping them with chinese weapons, i'd argue that, at this point, their logistic chain is ideally situated to accommodate participation in the su-35 program. particularly if that participation comprises cooperation in the airframe construction component of the program. taking this approach would necessitate neither that, either party radically alter their logistical chain, nor that, china increase its dependency upon russia for any technologies. it would, nevertheless, maintain, for the time being, china's dependency upon russia's engine technology. a dependency that, present circumstances inform us, would not constitute a departure from their current logistical practices.
sorry to butt in!
No problem -- I think engineer and I have more or less reached an impasse anyway.
With regards to SAC integrating chinese avionics into the Su-35... For a small batch of 24 that may be possible (but would present complications in regards to delaying delivery of the airframes, and other likely to emerge difficulties), but I don't think there is or was any intention for china to participate in Su-35 beyond acquiring a small batch. With SAC seemingly now oreinting to J-15 and J-16 production, using their existing flanker construction infrastructure to support Su-35 production (for whatever reason that ends up being) would delay the PLA's much needed naval and strike flankers.