It is quite real. Unexpected and perhaps a tad obfuscating, but nonetheless very real.
View attachment 35131
You would expect the number to be blotted out, would you?I really don't know what to think ... this image too looks fishy !
It is quite real. Unexpected and perhaps a tad obfuscating, but nonetheless very real.
View attachment 35131
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeh.
1; The camo doesnt match, so if someone faked it he certainly laid more work into it than usual by changing the camo scheme.
2; The pylons are lacking on the "faked" picture, again same point as above.
3; Shadows doesnt match between the supposed faked and the "source" picture.
4; Antennas on the vertical tail.
5; Etc etc.
Imho this is terrible and illogical "proof" of the picture being a fake. It might be a fake for all i know, but that "proof" is terrible in actually proving anything.
At the same time why would someone go through all the trouble to fake these images and spread fake rumors to such a degree?