It's not very precise expression but in most case when talking about something "independent" it always means that the key technologies or equipment involved are developed independently without foreign technologies involved, exchanged or purchased.
Exactly, that's precisely my line of thought. Thank you for making it concise.
The Chinese term 自主知识产权 (Self-controlled intellectual property rights) gives the impression that it is the result of 自主研发 (Independent research and development), and the promotion/slogan by enterprises & media using that term definitely reinforces that impression.
And so it confuses the hell out of people when things with 自主知识产权 claim aren't created using IP from 自主研发 (Independent research and development), but instead with Foreign developed IP that is now licensed/owned by China.
Therefore I think we can fairly say the claim can be highly misleading because we can never know if it's a Chinese self-developed IP/ Foreign developed IP that is now licensed/owned by China when the intention is to "brag" and give the impression that the product is the result of Independent research and development.
P.s. sorry for the long off-topic discussion, mods.